Cited by 152Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Do Stimulant Drugs Improve the Academic Performance of Hyperkinetic Children?: A Review of Outcome Studies

Barkley, Russell A., Cunningham, Charles E.·1978·Clinical Pediatrics

Abstract

Stimulant drug studies based primarily on measures of teacher opinion have frequently concluded that these drugs improve the achievement of hyperkinetic children. However, a review of those studies using more objective measures of academic performance revealed few positive short-term or long-term drug effects on these measures. What few improvements have been noted can be readily attributed to better attention during testing. The major effect of the stimulants appears to be an improvement in classroom manageability rather than academic performance. It would seem that the stimulants are not able to influence those etiologic factors, other than overactivity and inattentiveness, which predispose hyperkinetic children toward school difficulties. Hence, since the goal of pediatric intervention with these children should be to enhance school performance as well as reducing hyperactive behavior, the two should be independently and objectively monitored. Since stimulant medications fail to improve the academic performance of most of these children, additional educational assistance must be provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000992287801700112

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evidence that stimulant medication improves academic achievement is limited.

    “However, the evidence that stimulant medication improves academic achievement is limited (Arnold et al., 2020; Barkley & Cunningham, 1978; Baweja et al., 2015; Langberg & Becker, 2012; Loe & Feldman, 2007; Swanson et al., 1991).”
  • Medication on the day of testing may improve test scores via improved attention, but this does not reflect an effect on true academic achievement; the child's underlying academic skills remain unchanged.

    “Test scores may be improved by taking medication on the day(s) on which academic achievement testing is completed (e.g., via improved attention to answering the questions), but this clearly does not reflect an effect on true academic achievement—the child’s underlying academic skills (and thus, prognosis) remain unchanged (Barkley & Cunningham, 1978).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barkley, R. A., & Cunningham, C. E.
Affiliations
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin (US)
Venue
Clinical Pediatrics
Published
1978-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
85-92
ISSN
  • 0009-9228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2707
OpenAlex
W2144519150
Cited by
152
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
stimulants, hyperactive children, academic performance, attention, hyperactivity, inattention, school problems, objective performance measures, educational assistance
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Child, Clinical Trials as Topic, Double-Blind Method, Drug Evaluation, Educational Measurement, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hyperkinesis, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review