Do Stimulant Drugs Improve the Academic Performance of Hyperkinetic Children?: A Review of Outcome Studies
Abstract
Stimulant drug studies based primarily on measures of teacher opinion have frequently concluded that these drugs improve the achievement of hyperkinetic children. However, a review of those studies using more objective measures of academic performance revealed few positive short-term or long-term drug effects on these measures. What few improvements have been noted can be readily attributed to better attention during testing. The major effect of the stimulants appears to be an improvement in classroom manageability rather than academic performance. It would seem that the stimulants are not able to influence those etiologic factors, other than overactivity and inattentiveness, which predispose hyperkinetic children toward school difficulties. Hence, since the goal of pediatric intervention with these children should be to enhance school performance as well as reducing hyperactive behavior, the two should be independently and objectively monitored. Since stimulant medications fail to improve the academic performance of most of these children, additional educational assistance must be provided.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The evidence that stimulant medication improves academic achievement is limited.
“However, the evidence that stimulant medication improves academic achievement is limited (Arnold et al., 2020; Barkley & Cunningham, 1978; Baweja et al., 2015; Langberg & Becker, 2012; Loe & Feldman, 2007; Swanson et al., 1991).”
From The effect of stimulant medication on the learning of academic curricula in children with ADHD: A randomized crossover study. (2022) · cites this paper as Barkley & Cunningham, 1978
Medication on the day of testing may improve test scores via improved attention, but this does not reflect an effect on true academic achievement; the child's underlying academic skills remain unchanged.
“Test scores may be improved by taking medication on the day(s) on which academic achievement testing is completed (e.g., via improved attention to answering the questions), but this clearly does not reflect an effect on true academic achievement—the child’s underlying academic skills (and thus, prognosis) remain unchanged (Barkley & Cunningham, 1978).”
From The effect of stimulant medication on the learning of academic curricula in children with ADHD: A randomized crossover study. (2022) · cites this paper as Barkley & Cunningham, 1978
Cites
THE BEHAVIOR OF CHILDREN RECEIVING BENZEDRINE
Bradley, C. (1937) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.94.3.577 · Cited by 1,035 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advokat, C. (2010) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.03.006 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Factors associated with children's adherence to stimulant medication
Firestone, P. (1982) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01431.x · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Langberg, J. M., & Becker, S. P. (2012) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-012-0117-8 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Powers, R. L., Marks, D. J., Miller, C. J., Newcorn, J. H., & Halperin, J. M. (2008) · Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1089/cap.2008.021 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
DUPAUL, G. J., & RAPPORT, M. D. (1993) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199301000-00027 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
DRUG TREATMENT OF HYPERACTIVITY IN CHILDREN
Ottenbacher, K. J., & Cooper, H. M. (1983) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1983.tb13772.x · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Pelham, W. E., Altszuler, A. R., Merrill, B. M., Raiker, J. S., Macphee, F. L., Ramos, M., Gnagy, E. M., Greiner, A. R., Coles, E. K., Connor, C. M., et al. (2022) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000725 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“However, the evidence that stimulant medication improves academic achievement is limited (Arnold et al., 2020; Barkley & Cunningham, 1978; Baweja et al., 2015; Langberg & Becker, 2012; Loe & Feldman, 2007; Swanson et al., 1991).”
Background
- Authors
- Barkley, R. A., & Cunningham, C. E.
- Affiliations
- Children's Hospital of Wisconsin (US)
- Venue
- Clinical Pediatrics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1978-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-92
- ISSN
- 0009-9228 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2707
- OpenAlex
- W2144519150
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 9.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- stimulants, hyperactive children, academic performance, attention, hyperactivity, inattention, school problems, objective performance measures, educational assistance
- MeSH terms
- Central Nervous System Stimulants, Child, Clinical Trials as Topic, Double-Blind Method, Drug Evaluation, Educational Measurement, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hyperkinesis, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review