Cited by 219Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

What are the cognitive effects of stimulant medications? Emphasis on adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

Advokat, Claire·2010·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

The relevant literature concerning cognitive effects of amphetamine and methylphenidate, was reviewed, with an emphasis on research conducted in adults diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. As first-line treatment for ADHD, stimulant drugs are well-known to improve attention and concentration. Yet, there is increasing evidence that (as with children and adolescents), they do not promote learning and academic achievement in adult college students with ADHD. A review of neuropsychological studies indicates that, although response latencies are reduced, performance of ADHD adults on tests of 'distractibility' and 'planning' is also not consistently improved by stimulants. Studies in non-ADHD adults suggest that stimulants do not promote acquisition of new information, might improve retention of previously acquired information, and facilitate memory consolidation, but may actually impair performance of tasks that require adaptation, flexibility and planning. It is still not clear if improvement only occurs when there is a baseline deficit. Stimulants may influence cognition by their effects on physiological arousal. Regardless, the evidence does not support the conclusion that stimulants are cognitive 'enhancers.'

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.03.006

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Advokat, C.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Advokat, Claire
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
1256-1266
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984122101
Cited by
219
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
stimulant medication, amphetamine, methylphenidate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adult ADHD, cognitive effects, academic performance, distractibility, planning, memory consolidation, cognitive flexibility, response latency, physiological arousal, cognitive enhancement
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adult, Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Methylphenidate, Neuropsychological Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review