The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM): Conceptual Basis and Pilot Use in Children With Developmental Disabilities
Abstract
Few tools are available to pediatricians for tracking and monitoring disability status in children. We describe the conceptual basis and pilot use of the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM) . Our pilot use of this instrument in children with limb deficiency, Down's syndrome, spina bifida, cerebral palsy, and extreme prematurity demonstrates that the WeeFIM is a valid measure for tracking disability in preschool age and middle childhood. The WeeFIM measures the impact of developmental strengths and difficulties on independence at home, in school, and in the community. This allows the pediatrician to prioritize interventions for enhancing comprehensive functional outcomes and supporting families.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effects of Nintendo Wii‐Fit ® video games on balance in children with mild cerebral palsy
Tarakci, D., Ersoz Huseyinsinoglu, B., Tarakci, E., & Razak Ozdincler, A. (2016) · Pediatrics International · doi:10.1111/ped.12942 · Cited by 138
Acar, G., Altun, G. P., Yurdalan, S., & Polat, M. G. (2016) · Journal of Physical Therapy Science · doi:10.1589/jpts.28.774 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Msall, M. E., DiGaudio, K., Rogers, B. T., LaForest, S., Catanzaro, N. L., Campbell, J., Wilczenski, F., & Duffy, L. C.
- Venue
- Clinical Pediatrics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 421-430
- ISSN
- 0009-9228 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2707
- OpenAlex
- W2141481378
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
