Crafting Trust: The Role of Political Institutions in a Comparative Perspective
Abstract
In this article, the authors evaluate the origins of generalized trust. In addition to examining individual-level determinants, the analytic focus is on the political-institutional context. In contrast to most of the analyses to date, the authors conduct hierarchical analyses of the World Values Surveys (1995-1997 and 1999-2001) to simultaneously test for differences among respondents in 58 countries and for variations in levels of trust between countries with different institutional configurations. In addition, the authors extend the institutional theory of trust by introducing the power-sharing quality of institutions—a rather neglected institutional dimension hitherto. With regard to the most important contextual factors, the authors find that countries whose authorities are seen as incorruptible, whose institutions of the welfare state reduce income disparities, and whose political interests are represented in a manner proportional to their weight have citizens who are more likely to place trust in one another.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several controls on both individual and contextual levels are considered to avoid spurious effects between the religion variables and social trust.
“In order to avoid spurious effects between the religion variables and social trust, several controls on both the individual and contextual levels are considered”
From Moral Communities? Religion as a Source of Social Trust in a Multilevel Analysis of 97 German Regions (2011) · cites this paper as Freitag and Bühlmann, 2009
Cites
The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism
Hicks, A., & Esping-Andersen, G. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073705 · Cited by 7,092 · see citing works
Putnam, R. D. (2007) · Scandinavian Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x · Cited by 4,027 · see citing works
All for All: Equality, Corruption, and Social Trust
Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. M. (2005) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.2006.0022 · Cited by 1,529 · see citing works
Predicting Cross-National Levels of Social Trust: Global Pattern or Nordic Exceptionalism?
Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jci022 · Cited by 1,267 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How General Is Trust in “Most People”? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem
Delhey, J., Newton, K., & Welzel, C. (2011) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122411420817 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
Spheres of trust: An empirical analysis of the foundations of particularised and generalised trust
Freitag, M., & Traunmüller, R. (2009) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00849.x · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Self-citationTraunmuller, R. (2011) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcq011 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
- Authors
- Freitag, M., & Bühlmann, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Konstanz (DE)
- Centre for Democracy, Aarau, Switzerland
- ORCID
- Freitag, Markus
- Venue
- Comparative Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-03-05
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1537-1566
- ISSN
- 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3829
- OpenAlex
- W2040531561
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 38.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Comparative Political Studies (publishedVersion)
- Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Keywords
- generalized trust, power-sharing institutions, political corruption, welfare state institutions, income inequality, political representation, World Values Survey
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review