Cited by 233Social Capital and NetworksSocial Policy and Reform StudiesElectoral Systems and Political Participation

Crafting Trust: The Role of Political Institutions in a Comparative Perspective

Freitag, Markus, Bühlmann, Marc·2009·Comparative Political Studies

Abstract

In this article, the authors evaluate the origins of generalized trust. In addition to examining individual-level determinants, the analytic focus is on the political-institutional context. In contrast to most of the analyses to date, the authors conduct hierarchical analyses of the World Values Surveys (1995-1997 and 1999-2001) to simultaneously test for differences among respondents in 58 countries and for variations in levels of trust between countries with different institutional configurations. In addition, the authors extend the institutional theory of trust by introducing the power-sharing quality of institutions—a rather neglected institutional dimension hitherto. With regard to the most important contextual factors, the authors find that countries whose authorities are seen as incorruptible, whose institutions of the welfare state reduce income disparities, and whose political interests are represented in a manner proportional to their weight have citizens who are more likely to place trust in one another.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0010414009332151

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several controls on both individual and contextual levels are considered to avoid spurious effects between the religion variables and social trust.

    “In order to avoid spurious effects between the religion variables and social trust, several controls on both the individual and contextual levels are considered”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freitag, M., & Bühlmann, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
  • Centre for Democracy, Aarau, Switzerland
Venue
Comparative Political Studies
Published
2009-03-05
Volume
42
Issue
12
Pages
1537-1566
ISSN
  • 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3829
OpenAlex
W2040531561
Cited by
233
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
38.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comparative Political Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
generalized trust, power-sharing institutions, political corruption, welfare state institutions, income inequality, political representation, World Values Survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review