Turning a Blind Eye: Experimental Evidence of Partisan Bias in Attitudes Toward Corruption
Open accessAbstract
This article considers how partisanship conditions attitudes toward corruption. Stirred by the puzzle of why corruption does not seem to have the electoral consequences we would expect, it explores whether party supporters are more tolerant toward corruption cases when they affect their own party. The partisan-bias hypothesis is confirmed by a survey experiment carried out in Spain, a country where a number of corruption scandals have been recently visible. The results show that the same offense is judged differently depending on whether the responsible politician is a member of the respondent’s party, of unknown partisan affiliation, or of a rival party. Furthermore, the degree of partisan bias depends on political sophistication. This suggests that although partisanship may induce tolerance to same-party corruption practices, the partisan bias disappears when political awareness is high.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Citizens evaluate corrupt actions differently depending on the partisan affiliation of the involved politician: they tend to be more forgiving with co-partisan politicians and more condemning towards members of other parties.
“Citizens evaluate corrupt actions differently depending on the partisan affiliation of the involved politician: they tend to be more forgiving with copartisan politicians and more condemning towards members of other parties (Anduiza et al., 2013;Cornejo, 2023).”
From Political polarization and corruption: A theoretical and empirical review (2024) · cites this paper as Anduiza et al., 2013
Cites
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785 · see citing works
Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions
Bartels, L. M. (2002) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1021226224601 · Cited by 1,468 · see citing works
The Effects of Negativity and Motivated Information Processing During a Political Campaign
Meffert, M. F., Chung, S., Joiner, A. J., Waks, L., & Garst, J. (2006) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00003.x · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van der Laan, L. N., de Ridder, D. T. D., Charbonnier, L., Viergever, M. A., & Smeets, P. A. M. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00184 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Crepaz, M., & Arikan, G. (2024) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12555 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Political polarization and corruption: A theoretical and empirical review
Hajnal, Á. (2024) · Intersections · doi:10.17356/ieejsp.v10i2.1310 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
On the Defensive: Identity, Language, and Partisan Reactions to Political Scandal
Ekstrom, P. D., Gonzales, M. H., Williams, A. L., Weiner, E., & Aguilera, R. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672241247084 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Anduiza, E., Gallego, A., & Muñoz, J.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- Venue
- Comparative Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-05-30
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1664-1692
- ISSN
- 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3829
- OpenAlex
- W2112053984
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 58.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ddd.uab.cat
- Licence
- Locations
- Comparative Political Studies (publishedVersion)
- Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- corruption tolerance, partisanship, partisan bias, political sophistication, party identification, corruption scandals, political attitudes, Spain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review