The effects of transparency regulation on political trust and perceived corruption: Evidence from a survey experiment
Open accessAbstract
Scholarly evidence of transparency's beneficial effects on trust and perceptions of corruption remains debated and confined to the study of public administration. We contribute to this debate by extending the study of its effects to transparency legislation concerning members of parliament (MPs), political parties, and business interest groups. In an online experiment conducted in Ireland with 1373 citizens, we find that transparency in political donations improves trust in political parties, while asset declaration for conflict of interest prevention reduces perceptions of corruption toward MPs. However, transparency in lobbying is found to have no impact on attitudes toward business interest groups. This supports the common expectation that transparency improves political trust and reduces perceptions of corruption, but also confirms its complex effects. The study improves our understanding of transparency beyond open government providing an evaluation of different regulatory policies aimed at making the activities of parties, MPs, and lobby groups transparent.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Political Trust and Trustworthiness
Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475 · Cited by 2,190 · see citing works
Stealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs About How Government Should Work
Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613722 · Cited by 1,349 · see citing works
Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Toward Government in Contemporary Democracies
Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2003) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00007 · Cited by 1,311 · see citing works
The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government
Chanley, V. A., Rudolph, T. J., & Rahn, W. M. (2000) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/317987 · Cited by 884 · see citing works
Political Trust in a Cynical Age
Citrin, J., & Stoker, L. (2018) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
Social Capital and the Dynamics of Trust in Government
Keele, L. J. (2007) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00248.x · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Meijer, A. J. (2014) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mus048 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Indignation or resignation: The implications of transparency for societal accountability
Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2014) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.12033 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Transparency is not Enough: Making Transparency Effective in Reducing Corruption
Lindstedt, C., & Naurin, D. (2010) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/0192512110377602 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the “Narrow Data Base”
Druckman, J. N., & Kam, C. D. (2011) · Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511921452.004 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: an experiment
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2012) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852311429667 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Politicians, Scandals, and Trust in Government
Bowler, S., & Karp, J. A. (2004) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/b:pobe.0000043456.87303.3a · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Do we want trust in government?
Hardin, R. (1999) · Democracy and Trust · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511659959.002 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Turning a Blind Eye: Experimental Evidence of Partisan Bias in Attitudes Toward Corruption
Anduiza, E., Gallego, A., & Muñoz, J. (2013) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414013489081 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction
Park, H.-S., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2011) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852311399230 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Legislative Malfeasance and Political Accountability
Chang, E. C. C., Golden, M. A., & Hill, S. J. (2010) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887110000031 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
When Does Transparency Generate Legitimacy? Experimenting on a Context‐Bound Relationship
Licht, J. D. F., Naurin, D., Esaiasson, P., & Gilljam, M. (2012) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.12021 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Priming, Performance, and the Dynamics of Political Trust
Hetherington, M. J., & Rudolph, T. J. (2008) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381608080468 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
van Erkel, P. F. A., & van der Meer, T. (2015) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12115 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Organizing consent: The role of procedural fairness in political trust and compliance
Grimes, M. (2006) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00299.x · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Does Twitter Increase Perceived Police Legitimacy?
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Meijer, A. J. (2015) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12378 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Worthy, B. (2010) · Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Djankov, S., la Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2010) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.2.2.179 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Government Openness and Public Trust: The Mediating Role of Democratic Capacity
Schmidthuber, L., Ingrams, A., & Hilgers, D. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13298 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Policy Area as a Potential Moderator of Transparency Effects: An Experiment
de Fine Licht, J. (2014) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12194 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Scandals and Congressional Elections in the Post-Watergate Era
Basinger, S. J. (2012) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912912451144 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Flyverbom, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316442692 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Vargas, G. A., & Schlutz, D. (2016) · European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10610-016-9320-3 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Transparency and Trust in Government. Evidence from a Survey Experiment
Alessandro, M., Cardinale Lagomarsino, B., Scartascini, C., Streb, J., & Torrealday, J. (2021) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105223 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Does One Trust Judgement Fit All? Linking Theory and Empirics
Fisher, J., Hudson, J. V.-H., & Tucker, A. (2010) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1111/j.1467-856x.2009.00401.x · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Accountability and Transparency to Fight against Corruption: An International Comparative Analysis
Brusca, I., Rossi, F. M., & Aversano, N. (2017) · Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/13876988.2017.1393951 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Licht, J. D. F. (2011) · Scandinavian Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2011.00268.x · Cited by 121 · see citing works
THE EFFECTS OF JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY ON PUBLIC TRUST: EVIDENCE FROM A FIELD EXPERIMENT
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Klijn, A. (2015) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12149 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Campaign Finance Laws and Political Efficacy: Evidence from the States
Primo, D. M., & Milyo, J. D. (2006) · Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy · doi:10.1089/elj.2006.5.23 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Deliberation Behind Closed Doors: Transparency and Lobbying in the European Union
Naurin, D. (2007) · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Whiteley, P., Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D. A., & Stewart, M. C. (2015) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1111/1467-856x.12073 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Openwashing: A decoupling perspective on organizational transparency
Heimstädt, M. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.037 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Herkes, F., Leistikow, I. P., Verkroost, J., de Vries, F., & Zijlstra, W. G. (2019) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12278 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
The role of political trust in conditioning perceptions of corruption
Wroe, A., Allen, N. J., & Birch, S. (2012) · European Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s1755773912000094 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
The Good Politician and Political Trust: An Authenticity Gap in British Politics?
Valgarðsson, V. O., Clarke, N., Jennings, W., & Stoker, G. (2020) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321720928257 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Wang, Q., & Guan, Z. (2023) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muac040 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Transparency and Accountability: Causal, Critical and Constructive Perspectives
Heimstädt, M., & Dobusch, L. (2020) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/2631787720964216 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Uninformed Voters and Corrupt Politicians
Klašnja, M. (2017) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x16684574 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Public voices in the heavenly chorus? Group type bias and opinion representation
Flöthe, L., & Rasmussen, A. (2018) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1489418 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Žuffová, M. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101480 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Unrepresentative Information: The Case of Newspaper Reporting on Campaign Finance
Ansolabehere, S. D., Snowberg, E., & Snyder, J. M. (2005) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfi022 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Vadlamannati, K. C., & Cooray, A. V. (2016) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2016.1178385 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Keeping Them Honest: Public and Elite Perceptions of Ethical Conduct among Australian Legislators
McAllister, I. (2000) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00248 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
André, A., & Depauw, S. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9360-x · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Porumbescu, G. A., Meijer, A. J., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108678568 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Gauging the Impact of Transparency Policies
Michener, G. (2018) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13011 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
(Inequality in) Interest Group Involvement and the Legitimacy of Policy Making
Rasmussen, A., & Reher, S. (2022) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123422000242 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Bolleyer, N. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198758587.001.0001 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Priming political trust: Evidence from an experiment
Faulkner, N., Martin, A., & Peyton, K. (2014) · Australian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1080/10361146.2014.979759 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Transparency and Trust in Government (2007–2014): A Comparative Study
Mabillard, V., & Pasquier, M. (2016) · NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy · doi:10.1515/nispa-2016-0015 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Core values for ideal civil servants: Service‐oriented, responsive and dedicated
Neo, S., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Tummers, L. G. (2022) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13583 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Endogenous Corruption in Economic DevelopmentPreprint
Blackburn, K., Bose, N., & Haque, M. E. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.761705 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Who’s in Charge Here? Direct and Indirect Accusations and Voter Punishment of Corruption
Winters, M. S., & Weitz‐Shapiro, R. (2016) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912916634897 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Do constituents know (or care) about the lawmaking effectiveness of their representatives?
Butler, D. M., Hughes, A. G., Volden, C., & Wiseman, A. E. (2021) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2021.66 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Regulating lobbying (second edition)
Chari, R., Hogan, J., Murphy, G., et al. (2020) · Manchester University Press eBooks · doi:10.7765/9781526117243 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Getting Rich Too Fast? Voters’ Reactions to Politicians’ Wealth Accumulation
Chauchard, S., Klašnja, M., & Harish, S. P. (2019) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/704222 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Research guide to U.S. and international interest groups
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-1971 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Participation or Satisfaction? Examining Determinant of Trust in Local Government
Gustavsen, A., Pierre, J., & Roiseland, A. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.58235/sjpa.v21i3.11554 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Kanol, D. (2017) · Public Integrity · doi:10.1080/10999922.2017.1303882 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Public Perceptions of Sleaze in Britain
Mortimore, R. (1995) · Parliamentary Affairs · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pa.a052557 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Identifying voter preferences: The trade-off between honesty and competence
Galeotti, F., & Zizzo, D. J. (2018) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.03.007 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Usability of transparency portals: Examination of perceptions of journalists as information seekers
Crepaz, M., & Kneafsey, L. (2021) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12777 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationCitizen Attitudes on Politicians’ Pay: Trust Issues Are Not Solved by Delegation
Pedersen, R. T., & Pedersen, L. H. (2019) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321719850073 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Regulating Ethics in Parliaments: Measuring Regime Robustness
Coroado, S. D., & de Sousa, L. (2022) · Public Integrity · doi:10.1080/10999922.2022.2075640 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Competence Versus Trustworthiness: What Do Voters Care About?Preprint
Galeotti, F., & Zizzo, D. J. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2408914 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Freedom of information: a state of the art
Worthy, B. (2021) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781789903584.00029 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Promoting Fiscal OpennessPreprint
Roberts, A. S. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2608967 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Chari, R., Hogan, J., Murphy, G., & Crepaz, M. (2020). Regulating lobbying: A global comparison. Manchester University Press.
- Crepaz, M., & Arikan, G. (2021). Information disclosure and political trust during the COVID-19 crisis: Experimental evi- dence from Ireland. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(sup1), 96-108.
- Druckman, J. N., & Kam, C. D. (2011). Students as experimental participants. Cambridge handbook of experimental political science, 1, 41-57.
- Fenno, R. F. (2003). Home style: House members in their districts. Pearson College Division.
- Kollman, K. (2004). Interest groups and public opinion. In C. S. Thomas (Ed.), Research guide to US and international interest groups (pp. 89-91). Greenwood Publishing Group.
- Rose-Ackerman, S. (2001). Trust, honesty and corruption: Reflection on the state-building process. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 42(3), 526-570.
- Sances, M. W. (2013). Is money in politics harming trust in government? Evidence from two survey experiments. Election Law Journal, 12(1), 53-73.
- Authors
- Crepaz, M., & Arikan, G.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland
- Corresponding author
- Crepaz, Michele
- ORCID
- Crepaz, Michele
- Venue
- Regulation & Governance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-09-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 896-913
- ISSN
- 1748-5983 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-5991
- OpenAlex
- W4386724492
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 16.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Regulation & Governance (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Irish Research Council (GOIPD/2018/52)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Administrative Law and Governance
- Keywords
- transparency regulation, public trust in government, corruption perception, campaign contributions, asset declaration, conflicts of interest, lobbying transparency, Members of Parliament, political parties, business interest groups, open government, Ireland
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
