The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving Social Well-Being Through New Democratic Institutions
Abstract
We evaluate the role of a new type of democratic institution, participatory budgeting (PB), for improving citizens’ well-being. Participatory institutions are said to enhance governance, citizens’ empowerment, and the quality of democracy, creating a virtuous cycle to improve the poor’s well-being. Drawing from an original database of Brazil’s largest cities over the last 20 years, we assess whether adopting PB programs influences several indicators of well-being inputs, processes, and outcomes. We find PB programs are strongly associated with increases in health care spending, increases in civil society organizations, and decreases in infant mortality rates. This connection strengthens dramatically as PB programs remain in place over longer time frames. Furthermore, PB’s connection to well-being strengthens in the hand of mayors from the nationally powerful, ideologically and electorally motivated Workers’ Party. Our argument directly addresses debates on democracy and well-being and has powerful implications for participation, governance, and economic development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
North, D. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 · Cited by 32,691
Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpi014 · Cited by 6,223 · cited 1×
“We use this variable in all of its configurations following Brambor, Clark, and Golder (2006) and Braumoeller (2004) to model our three dependent variables below.”
MethodMapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement
Gaventa, J., & Barrett, G. (2012) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.014 · Cited by 332
Cited by
Digital citizen empowerment: a systematic literature review of theories and development models
Sharma, S., Kar, A. K., Gupta, M. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Janssen, M. (2022) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2022.2046533 · Cited by 90
Does Participatory Budgeting Change the Share of Public Funding to Low Income Neighborhoods?
Shybalkina, I., & Bifulco, R. (2019) · Public Budgeting & Finance · doi:10.1111/pbaf.12212 · Cited by 87
Testing the Participation Hypothesis: Evidence from Participatory Budgeting
Johnson, C., Carlson, H. J., & Reynolds, S. (2023) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-021-09679-w · Cited by 46
Shybalkina, I. (2022) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12754 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Touchton, M., & Wampler, B.
- Venue
- Comparative Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-12-27
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1442-1469
- ISSN
- 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3829
- OpenAlex
- W2147087460
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 69.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.