Cited by 90E-Government and Public ServicesSocial Media and PoliticsSmart Cities and Technologies

Digital citizen empowerment: a systematic literature review of theories and development models

Open access
Sharma, Swapnil, Kar, Arpan K., Gupta, M. P., Dwivedi, Yogesh K., Janssen, Marijn·2022·Information Technology for Development

Abstract

Governments worldwide invest heavily in digital initiatives to develop information societies with connected and actively engaged citizens, but problems like lacking sustained engagement and quality of participation still plague them. We undertook a systematised literature review on the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases, covering dispersed literature surrounding Digital Citizen Empowerment (DCE) from the past two decades.Categorising the literature under four thematic categories or strategies of DCE: Digital Activism (DA), Multi-channel Service Delivery (MCSD), Participatory Budgeting (PB), and Deliberative Governance (DG) critical comparative analysis is done. A conceptual model of DCE, covering how theories from different inter-disciplinary areas of political, social, and information science influence the development of information societies and DCE is presented. Action points in our conceptual model are mapped to policy objectives targeting improved delivery of empowering policy goals by practitioners, and future research opportunities in the context of DCE are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02681102.2022.2046533

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Berger, P. L., & Neuhaus, R. J. (1996). To Empower People-From State to Civil Society (M. Novak (ed.); 2nd ed.). The AEI Press.
  2. Boyte, H. C., & Evans, S. M. (1984). STRATEGIES IN SEARCH OF AMERICA- CULTURAL RADICALISM, POPULISM, AND DEMOCRATIC CULTURE. Socialist Review, 75(7), 72-100.
  3. Bucy, E. P., & Gregson, K. S. (2001). Media Participation-A legitimizing mechanism of mass democracy. New Media & Society, 3(3), 357-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444801003003006 · DOI
  4. Nothias, T., & Cheruiyot, D. (2019). A "Hotbed" of digital empowerment? Media criticism in Kenya between playful engagement and co-option. International Journal of Communication, 13, 136-159.
  5. World Bank. (2008). Brazil: toward a more inclusive and effective participatory budget in Porto Alegre (Vol. 2, Issue 40144). http://www- wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2008/03/05/0003330 37_20080305020620/Rendered/PDF/401440v20ER0P01sclosed0March0302008.pdf

Authors
Sharma, S., Kar, A. K., Gupta, M. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Janssen, M.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Sharma, Swapnil
Venue
Information Technology for Development
Published
2022-03-02
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
660-687
ISSN
  • 0268-1102 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-0170
OpenAlex
W4214926328
Cited by
90
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7
FWCI
12.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Information Technology for Development (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Cronfa (Swansea University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission (2015–2020)
  • Swansea University
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
  • Ministry of Education, India
  • Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
Keywords
digital activism, participatory budgeting, deliberative governance, citizen participation, information society, conceptual model, e-government

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review