Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 837

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities

Evetts, Julia·2011·Current Sociology

Abstract

Sociologists interested in professional work and occupations have differentiated professionalism as a distinctive and special way of controlling and organizing work and workers, with real advantages for both practitioners and clients. In this interpretation the analysis of professionalism is as an ‘occupational value’. But professionalism is changing and being changed as professionals now increasingly work in large-scale organizational workplaces and sometimes in international firms. This article explains professionalism as an occupational value and indicates both the changes to and continuities in professionalism in these organizational contexts. Then some of the possible consequences of the redefinition of professionalism are examined for practitioner-workers and their clients in public sector service work such as health, welfare and education. These consequences include changes in the work itself, in practitioner—employer and practitioner—client relations, and in the control of work priorities and processes. The final section considers if there might also be some advantages in the combination of professional and organizational logics for controlling work and workers and whether there are opportunities associated with these changes which might improve both the conduct and practice of professional service work, while being of benefit to practitioners and clients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0011392111402585

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 837

Metadata

Authors
Evetts, J.
Venue
Current Sociology
Published
2011-06-29
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
406-422
ISSN
  • 0011-3921 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7064
OpenAlex
W2120646341
Cited by
837
References
2
FWCI
57.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0011392111402585
The paper
Evetts, J. (2011). A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities. Current Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111402585

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.