The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability Methods: A Note on the Frequency of Use of Various Types
Abstract
This study examined the frequency of use of various types of reliability coefficients for a systematically drawn sample of 696 tests appearing in the APA-published Directory of Unpublished Experimental Mental Measures. Almost all articles included some type of reliability report for at least one test administration. Coefficient alpha was the over-whelming favorite among types of coefficients. Several measures treated almost universally in psychological-testing textbooks were rarely or never used. Problems encountered in the study included ambiguous designations of types of coefficients, reporting reliability based on a study other than the one cited, inadequate information about subscales, and simply incorrect recording of the information given in an original source.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594 · Cited by 2,791
Cited by
Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here.
McNeish, D. (2018) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000144 · Cited by 2,533
Ponterotto, J. G., & Ruckdeschel, D. E. (2007) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.105.3.997-1014 · Cited by 555
A Tutorial on Hierarchically Structured Constructs
Brunner, M., Nagy, G., & Wilhelm, O. (2012) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00749.x · Cited by 459
Charter, R. A. (2003) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221300309601160 · Cited by 254
Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., Rey, G. D., Ginns, P., Krell, M., & Schneider, S. (2022) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-022-09683-4 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Hogan, T. P., Benjamin, A., & Brezinski, K. L.
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 523-531
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3888
- OpenAlex
- W2088075110
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliability Methods: A Note on the Frequency of Use of Various Types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00131640021970691
- The paper
- Hogan, T. P., Benjamin, A., & Brezinski, K. L. (2000). Reliability Methods: A Note on the Frequency of Use of Various Types. Educational and Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970691
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
