The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Type I Error Rate Comparisons of Post Hoc Procedures for I j Chi-Square Tables
Abstract
The authors used Monte Carlo methods to assess the per-contrast and experimentwise Type I error rates of two post hoc tests of cellwise residuals and four post hoc tests of pairwise contrasts in 3 4 chi-square contingency tables. The six post hoc procedures were evaluated under three sample sizes and under the null hypotheses of independence and homogeneity. Results of the study indicate that the cellwise adjusted residual method provided adequate experimentwise Type I error rate control when appropriate adjustments to the alpha level were made, and the Gardner pairwise post hoc procedure provided several advantages over the other pairwise procedures. This was true for both the independence and homogeneity models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smith, E. D., Lakdawala, N. K., Papoutsidakis, N., Aubert, G., Mazzanti, A., McCanta, A. C., Agarwal, P. P., Arscott, P., Dellefave-Castillo, L. M., Vorovich, E. E., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.119.044934 · Cited by 504
Incidence and Risk Factors of Insomnia in a Population-Based Sample
LeBlanc, M., Mérette, C., Savard, J., Ivers, H., Baillargeon, L., & Morin, C. M. (2009) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/32.8.1027 · Cited by 493
Barnett, M. L., Gonzalez, A., Miranda, J., Chavira, D. A., & Lau, A. S. (2018) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-017-0815-0 · Cited by 431
Phantasia–The psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes
Zeman, A., Milton, F., Della Sala, S., Dewar, M., Frayling, T., Gaddum, J., Hattersley, A., Heuerman-Williamson, B., Jones, K., MacKisack, M., et al. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.003 · Cited by 336
Online Sexual Activity Experiences Among College Students: A Four-Country Comparison
Döring, N., Daneback, K., Shaughnessy, K., Grov, C., & Byers, E. S. (2017) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0656-4 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- MacDonald, P. L., & Gardner, R. C.
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 735-754
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3888
- OpenAlex
- W2062055237
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Type I Error Rate Comparisons of Post Hoc Procedures for I j Chi-Square Tables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00131640021970871
- The paper
- MacDonald, P. L., & Gardner, R. C. (2000). Type I Error Rate Comparisons of Post Hoc Procedures for I j Chi-Square Tables. Educational and Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970871
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
