Cited by 431Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Policy Implementation ScienceCultural Competency in Health Care

Mobilizing community health workers to address mental health disparities for underserved populations: a systematic review

Open access
Barnett, Miya L., Gonzalez, Araceli, Miranda, Jeanne, Chavira, Denise A., Lau, Anna S.·2018·Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract

This systematic review evaluates efforts to date to involve community health workers (CHWs) in delivering evidence-based mental health interventions to underserved communities in the United States and in low- and middle-income countries. Forty-three articles (39 trials) were reviewed to characterize the background characteristics of CHW, their role in intervention delivery, the types of interventions they delivered, and the implementation supports they received. The majority of trials found that CHW-delivered interventions led to symptom reduction. Training CHWs to support the delivery of evidence-based practices may help to address mental health disparities. Areas for future research as well as clinical and policy implications are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10488-017-0815-0

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few studies have used community health workers to deliver a psychosocial intervention tailored to minority and immigrant elders in the United States.

    “However, few studies have worked with CHWs to provide a psychosocial intervention tailored to minority and immigrant elders in the US (38).”

    From Effectiveness of a Disability Preventive Intervention for Minority and Immigrant Elders: The Positive Minds-Strong Bodies Randomized Clinical Trial (2019) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Results and Discussion report fewer US than low- and middle-income-country trials of CHW-involved psychosocial interventions, and the Methods specify that US studies included in the review primarily served racial or ethnic minorities. The review does not establish how many studies tailored such interventions specifically to minority and immigrant elders in the US; its age comparison distinguishes only adults from children and families. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Less attention has been paid to using digital technologies to train community health workers in delivering psychological interventions, particularly in rural India.

    “Digital interventions appear to have been effective for training community health workers in general health care delivery (Agarwal et al., 2015), though use of digital technologies for training community health workers to deliver psychological interventions, especially in settings in rural India, has received less attention (Barnett et al., 2018; Borkum et al., 2014; Modi et al., 2017; Naslund et”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. World Health Organization 2008 Mental Health Gap Action Programme: Scaling up care for mental, neurological, and substance use disorders Geneva WHO Press 26290926
  2. World Health Organization 2010 Packages of interventions for family planning, safe abortion care, maternal, newborn and child health Geneva WHO Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnett, M. L., Gonzalez, A., Miranda, J., Chavira, D. A., & Lau, A. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Barnett, Miya L.
Venue
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published
2017-07-20
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
195-211
ISSN
  • 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3289
OpenAlex
W2739197041
Cited by
431
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH110608)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
community health workers, mental health disparities, underserved populations, evidence-based practice, CHW training, implementation support, symptom relief, low- and middle-income countries, United States
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Community Health Services, Female, Health Policy, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, United States, Vulnerable Populations, Healthcare Disparities, Evidence-Based Practice, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review