The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of Structure Coefficients in Published Multiple Regression Articles: Β Is Not Enough
Abstract
The importance of interpreting structure coefficients throughout the General Linear Model (GLM) is widely accepted. However, regression researchers too infrequently consult regression structure coefficients to augment their interpretations. The authors reviewed articles published in the Journal of Applied Psychology to determine how interpretations might have differed if standardized regression coefficients and structure coefficients (or else bivariate rs of predictors with the criterion) had been interpreted. Some dramatic misinterpretations or incomplete interpretations are summarized. It is suggested that beta weights and structure coefficients (or else bivariate rs of predictors with the criterion) ought to be interpreted when noteworthy regression results have been isolated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594 · Cited by 2,791
Stepwise Regression and Stepwise Discriminant Analysis Need Not Apply here: A Guidelines Editorial
Thompson, B. (1995) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164495055004001 · Cited by 434
Self-citation
Cited by
The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164405282471 · Cited by 7,403
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications.
Thompson, B. (2004) · doi:10.1037/10694-000 · Cited by 3,469
Self-citationHenson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164405282485 · Cited by 2,454
Akinwande, M. O., Dikko, H. G., & Samson, A. (2015) · Open Journal of Statistics · doi:10.4236/ojs.2015.57075 · Cited by 1,534
Relative Importance Analysis: A Useful Supplement to Regression Analysis
Tonidandel, S., & LeBreton, J. M. (2011) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9204-3 · Cited by 953
Metadata
- Authors
- Courville, T., & Thompson, B.
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-04-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 229-248
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 0000-0000
- OpenAlex
- W2061339789
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Structure Coefficients in Published Multiple Regression Articles: Β Is Not Enough. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00131640121971211
- The paper
- Courville, T., & Thompson, B. (2001). Use of Structure Coefficients in Published Multiple Regression Articles: Β Is Not Enough. Educational and Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.