Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 226

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for the Assessment of Computer Attitudes

Loyd, Brenda H., Loyd, Douglas E.·1985·Educational and Psychological Measurement

Abstract

As computer-related programs are introduced into school curricula, it is helpful to evaluate teacher attitudes toward computer use which may affect the success of such programs. Involving 114 teachers enrolled in microcomputer staff development courses, this study was concerned with the reliability, the factorial validity, and the differential validity of the Computer Attitude Scale and its four subscales (Computer Anxiety, Computer Confidence, Computer Liking, and Computer Usefulness). This instrument was found to be reliable in measuring teachers' attitudes toward computers and effective in differentiating among teachers with different amounts of computer experience.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0013164485454021

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 226

Metadata

Authors
Loyd, B. H., & Loyd, D. E.
Venue
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Published
1985-12
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
903-908
ISSN
  • 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3888
OpenAlex
W2093236037
Cited by
226
References
0
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for the Assessment of Computer Attitudes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0013164485454021
The paper
Loyd, B. H., & Loyd, D. E. (1985). The Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for the Assessment of Computer Attitudes. Educational and Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485454021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.