Cited by 147Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPersonality Traits and PsychologyReliability and Agreement in Measurement

Measurement Errors in the Behavioral Sciences: The Case of Personality/Attitude Research

Buckley, M. Ronald, Cote, Joseph A., Comstock, S. Mark·1990·Educational and Psychological Measurement

Abstract

It has been established that construct measures often contain measurement error and method effects. However, the extent of these measurement problems and their effects on personality constructs has not been fully examined. In this study, an analysis of published data sets affords estimates of the amount of trait, method, and error variance of measures used in the social/behavioral sciences. It was found that traits accounted for less than 50 percent of the variance in construct measures among the entire group of data sets included in the study. Measures of attitudes and personality variables contain considerably less trait variance. Implications for theory testing are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0013164490503001

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buckley, M. R., Cote, J. A., & Comstock, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • Washington State University (US)
Venue
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Published
1990-09
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
447-474
ISSN
  • 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3888
OpenAlex
W2143445213
Cited by
147
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords
measurement error, personality traits, attitudes, trait variation, method variance, error variance, construct validity, theory testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review