The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Restorative Experience and Self-Regulation in Favorite Places
Abstract
The authors report further evidence bearing on the relations among restorative experiences, self-regulation, and place attachment. University students ( n = 101) described their favorite places and experiences in them, and 98 other students described unpleasant places. Natural settings were overrepresented among favorite places and underrepresented among the unpleasant places. In open-ended accounts, frequent mention of being relaxed, being away from everyday life, forgetting worries, and reflecting on personal matters indicated a link between favorite places and restorative experience. Restoration was particularly typical of natural favorite places. Structured evaluations of being away, fascination, coherence, and compatibility indicated they were experienced to a high degree in the favorite places, although fascination to a lesser degree than compatibility. The favorite and unpleasant places differed substantially in all four restorative qualities but especially in being away and compatibility. Self-referencing appears to be more characteristic of favorite place experiences than engaging or interesting environmental properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework
Kaplan, S. (1995) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 · Cited by 6,923
A measure of restorative quality in environments.
Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G. W., & Gärling, T. (1997) · Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research · doi:10.1080/02815739708730435 · Cited by 916
Self-citationMehta, R., & Belk, R. W. (1991) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208566 · Cited by 543
Cited by
A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments
Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L. M., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-456 · Cited by 1,993
Why Is Nature Beneficial?: The Role of Connectedness to Nature
Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916508319745 · Cited by 1,298
The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health
Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., & Daily, G. C. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x · Cited by 1,275
The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition
Bratman, G. N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B. J., & Gross, J. J. (2015) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.005 · Cited by 939
Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation
Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., Hahn, K. S., Daily, G. C., & Gross, J. J. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1510459112 · Cited by 932
Metadata
- Authors
- Korpela, K. M., Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Fuhrer, U.
- Venue
- Environment and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 572-589
- ISSN
- 0013-9165 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-390X
- OpenAlex
- W2142153540
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restorative Experience and Self-Regulation in Favorite Places. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00139160121973133
- The paper
- Korpela, K. M., Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Fuhrer, U. (2001). Restorative Experience and Self-Regulation in Favorite Places. Environment and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973133
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
