The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Place Identification, Social Cohesion, and Enviornmental Sustainability
Abstract
In the study reported in this article the roles of social cohesion, residential satisfaction, and place identification are examined for their effect on place-related social identity and its consequential impact on attitudes to environmental sustainability. Two neighborhoods in Guildford, Surrey, England were selected on the basis of their social histories, housing types, and socioeconomic composition. Ninety residents in each neighborhood were sampled. Research methods included cognitive mapping and a questionnaire survey. A structural equation model was used to analyze the covariances between the different factors. The results show clear differences between the two neighborhoods in terms of residential satisfaction, with only some differences in terms of identification and social cohesion and sustainability. Conclusions are drawn that suggest an important relationship between identity and sustainability behavior that is suggestive for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slovic, P. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563507 · Cited by 9,271
Cited by
The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Gifford, R. (2011) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0023566 · Cited by 2,326
Kingsley, J. ‘., Townsend, M., & Henderson‐Wilson, C. (2009) · Leisure Studies · doi:10.1080/02614360902769894 · Cited by 285
“This is of great importance as with the increase in urbanisation individuals have less contact with nature (Frumkin, 2002; Uzzell et al., 2002) and feel less safe, less satisfied and less socially involved with their neighbourhood (Zaff & Devlin, 1998).”
BackgroundSeeland, K., Dübendorfer, S., & Hansmann, R. (2009) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2008.07.005 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Uzzell, D., Pol, E., & Badenas, D.
- Venue
- Environment and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-53
- ISSN
- 0013-9165 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-390X
- OpenAlex
- W2149783615
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
