The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining the Relationship Between Physical Vulnerability and Public Perceptions of Global Climate Change in the United States
Abstract
Although there is a growing body of research examining public perceptions of global climate change, little work has focused on the role of place and proximity in shaping these perceptions. This study extends previous conceptual models explaining risk perception associated with global climate change by adding a spatial dimension. Specifically, Geographic Information Systems and spatial analytical techniques are used to map and measure survey respondents' physical risk associated with expected climate change. Using existing spatial data, multiple measures of climate change vulnerability are analyzed along with demographic, attitudinal, and social contextual variables derived from a representative national survey to predict variation in risk perception. Bivariate correlation and multivariate regression analyses are used to identify and explain the most important indicators shaping individual risk perception. Analysis of the data suggests that the relationship between actual and perceived risk is driven by specific types of physical conditions and experiences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slovic, P. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563507 · Cited by 9,271
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176 · Cited by 5,678
The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change
Oreskes, N. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1103618 · Cited by 1,814
Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change
O'Connor, R. E., Bard, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1999) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00421.x · Cited by 957
Cited by
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x · Cited by 2,340
Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003 · Cited by 1,217
van der Linden, S. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2008 · Cited by 316
Collins, T. W., Grineski, S. E., Chakraborty, J., & Flores, A. B. (2019) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.108772 · Cited by 134
The impacts of temperature anomalies and political orientation on perceived winter warming
McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., & Xiao, C. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2443 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Vedlitz, A., & Grover, H.
- Venue
- Environment and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-08-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 72-95
- ISSN
- 0013-9165 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-390X
- OpenAlex
- W2101436061
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 27.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining the Relationship Between Physical Vulnerability and Public Perceptions of Global Climate Change in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0013916506298800
- The paper
- Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Vedlitz, A., & Grover, H. (2008). Examining the Relationship Between Physical Vulnerability and Public Perceptions of Global Climate Change in the United States. Environment and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298800
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.