Cited by 2,340Climate Change Communication and PerceptionClimate Change Policy and EconomicsElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010

McCright, Aaron M., Dunlap, Riley E.·2011·The Sociological Quarterly

Abstract

We examine political polarization over climate change within the American public by analyzing data from 10 nationally representative Gallup Polls between 2001 and 2010. We find that liberals and Democrats are more likely to report beliefs consistent with the scientific consensus and express personal concern about global warming than are conservatives and Republicans. Further, the effects of educational attainment and self-reported understanding on global warming beliefs and concern are positive for liberals and Democrats, but are weaker or negative for conservatives and Republicans. Last, significant ideological and partisan polarization has occurred on the issue of climate change over the past decade.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Democrats in the U.S. have greater belief in and concern for climate change than Republicans.

    “McCright and Dunlap (2011) have shown that Democrats in the U.S. have greater belief in and concern for climate change than Republicans.”
  • Exposure to different kinds of information on media, politicization of climate change, and exposure to fake information on social media are potential reasons that can contribute to polarization of beliefs about the reality of climate change.

    “Various factors like exposure to different kind of information on the media (Iyengar and Massey, 2019;Williams, 2016), politicization of climate change (McCright and Dunlap, 2011), and exposure to fake information on social media platforms are potential reasons that can contribute to polarization of beliefs about the reality of climate change.”

    From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as McCright and Dunlap, 2011

  • Heterogeneous and bimodal distributions of opinions have been measured in political surveys, especially on controversial issues.

    “However, this prediction is not always confirmed empirically: heterogeneous and bimodal distributions of opinions have been measured in political surveys [6, 7], especially on controversial issues, like abortion or global warming [8, 9].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Oklahoma State University (US)
Corresponding author
McCright, Aaron M.
Venue
The Sociological Quarterly
Published
2011-05
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
155-194
ISSN
  • 0038-0253 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-8525
OpenAlex
W2128082596
Cited by
2,340
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 142 · 2025: 162 · 2024: 208 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 185 · 2021: 184 · 2020: 230 · 2019: 188 · 2018: 170 · 2017: 167 · 2016: 163 · 2015: 141 · 2014: 111 · 2013: 73 · 2012: 48
FWCI
261.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociological Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
climate change, climate change beliefs, political polarization, partisanship, ideology, liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, public opinion, scientific consensus, educational attainment, politicization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review