The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying Valid Measures of Reading
Abstract
Three concurrent validity studies were conducted to determine the relationship between performances on formative measures of reading and standardized achievement measures of reading. Correlational analyses for five formative measures and three standardized measures provided evidence for the validity of Words in Isolation, Words in Context, and Oral Reading as indices of reading achievement. Comparisons of performance of regular and resource program students in grades one through six revealed marked differences between the two groups and across grades. The usefulness of the formative measures for continuous evaluation of student growth in reading is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data Based IEP Development: An Approach to Substantive Compliance
Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1980) · TEACHING Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/004005998001200302 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Cited by
Curriculum-Based Measurement: The Emerging Alternative
Deno, S. L. (1985) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440298505200303 · Cited by 1,667
Self-citationSources of Individual Differences in Reading Comprehension and Reading Fluency.
Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.719 · Cited by 580
Self-citationGood, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0503_4 · Cited by 545
Using Curriculum‐Based Measurement to Improve Student Achievement: Review of Research
Stecker, P. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.20113 · Cited by 506
Formative Evaluation of Academic Progress: How Much Growth Can We Expect?
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.1993.12085636 · Cited by 442
Metadata
- Authors
- Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B.
- Venue
- Exceptional Children
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1982-09
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-47
- ISSN
- 0014-4029 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-5560
- OpenAlex
- W4300297215
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying Valid Measures of Reading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001440298204900105
- The paper
- Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying Valid Measures of Reading. Exceptional Children. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298204900105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
