The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Longitudinal Examination of the Fourth Grade Slump in Creativity
Abstract
From September 1959 to May 1964 the children enrolled in a university and a public elementary school were tested each year with a battery of tests of creative thinking. Relatively complete data were obtained for 350 children. A random sample of 100 cases was drawn from this pool for further analysis. All raw scores were converted to standard or T-scores based on fifth grade comparison group norms. The results showed that when studied longitudinally, there are statistically significant slumps in fluency, flexibility, originality and elaboration. Although from 45 to 61 percent of the subjects showed significant slumps (losses of five or more standard score points), there were a few who showed significant increases ranging from 11 percent on fluency to 38 percent on elaboration. There is a general recovery trend in the fifth grade but from 16 to 29 percent show decreases of five or more standard score points between the third and fifth grades. Many children end up with lower scores in the fifth grade than they attained in the third grade. The proportion ranges from 21 percent on elaboration to 52 percent on fluency. In general there is the strongest tendency for growth in elaboration and the weakest In fluency.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In child development, researchers have observed the “fourth-grade slump”, a period during 3th-4th grade when children's divergent thinking abilities tend to decline [50].”
From Child-AI Co-Creation: A Review of the Current Research Landscape and a Proposal for Six Design Considerations (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
Torrance, E. P. (1962) · Prentice-Hall, Inc eBooks · doi:10.1037/13134-000 · Cited by 1,603
Self-citationTorrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms -- Technical Manual
Wallach, M. A., & Torrance, E. P. (1968) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1161826 · Cited by 851
Self-citationEducation and the Creative Potential
Field, D., & Torrance, E. P. (1964) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119124 · Cited by 448
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Hosford P. M., 1967, “Atlanta Public Schools: Psychological Services, 1966-67”
- Torrance E. P., 1965, Rewarding Creative Behavior.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1 · Cited by 1,794
Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.652929 · Cited by 1,696
Runco, M. A. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502 · Cited by 994
Runco, M. A., & O’Neal, I. C. (1995) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf02213373 · Cited by 539
Lee, C. S., & Therriault, D. J. (2013) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.008 · Cited by 402
Metadata
- Authors
- Torrance, E. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Torrance, E. Paul
- Venue
- Gifted Child Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1968-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 195-199
- ISSN
- 0016-9862 (ISSN-L)
- 1934-9041
- OpenAlex
- W2117999054
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gifted Child Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- creativity, creative thinking, elementary school students, longitudinal change, fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration, grade level differences, creativity development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review