Cited by 107Physical Activity and HealthHealth and Lifestyle StudiesContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

An ecological momentary assessment of the physical activity and sedentary behaviour patterns of university students

Open access
Rouse, Peter C, Biddle, Stuart J H·2010·Health Education Journal

Abstract

Objective We used ecological momentary assessment to understand the physical activity and sedentary behaviour patterns of university students. Study design Cross sectional, opportunistic sample from a university in the English midlands. Methods Ecological momentary assessment diaries were completed every 15 minutes across two days. The sample comprised 46 males (mean age 20.2 years) and 38 females (mean age 19.5 years). The majority of participants were undergraduates (96.5 per cent) and white European (85 per cent). Results Although ‘studying’ was the predominant behaviour (280 minutes), students spent time conducting a range of behaviours including ‘watching television’ (79.9 minutes), ‘sitting and talking’ (72.1 minutes) and ‘hanging out’ (64.0 minutes). Repeated measure ANOVAs revealed a significant gender effect for some behaviours with ‘studying’ [ F(1,82) = 10.50, p < .006] and ‘computer game playing’ [ F(1,82) = 7.97, p < .006] being higher in males, and ‘sitting and talking’ [ F(1,82) = 24.49, p < .006] higher in females. Pearson correlations suggested that sedentary behaviours compete with each other for students’ time. A significant small negative relationship existed between sedentary technology behaviours and physical activity for males ( r = -.217) but not for females ( r = -.182). Conclusions Students participate in a range of sedentary behaviours that differ by gender. Results question public perception that selected sedentary behaviours, such as ‘watching television’, are responsible for declining levels of sport and exercise participation in this age group. Implications for interventions are considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0017896910363145

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rouse, P. C., & Biddle, S. J. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Rouse, Peter C
Venue
Health Education Journal
Published
2010-03
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
116-125
ISSN
  • 0017-8969 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-8176
OpenAlex
W2112281156
Cited by
107
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Education Journal (publishedVersion)
  • The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
physical activity, sedentary behavior, university students, ecological momentary assessment, gender differences, time use, television viewing, video gaming, studying, sitting behavior, technology use, exercise participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review