Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 56

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human Factors Measurement for Future Air Traffic Control Systems

Langan-Fox, Janice, Sankey, Michael J., Canty, James M.·2009·Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
DOI 10.1177/0018720809355278
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective: This article provides a critical review of research pertaining to the measurement of human factors (HF) issues in current and future air traffic control (ATC). Background: Growing worldwide air traffic demands call for a radical departure from current ATC systems. Future systems will have a fundamental impact on the roles and responsibilities of ATC officers (ATCOs). Valid and reliable methods of assessing HF issues associated with these changes, such as a potential increase (or decrease) in workload, are of utmost importance for advancing theory and for designing systems, procedures, and training. Method: We outline major aviation changes and how these relate to five key HF issues in ATC. Measures are outlined, compared, and evaluated and are followed by guidelines for assessing these issues in the ATC domain. Recommendations for future research are presented. Results: A review of the literature suggests that situational awareness and workload have been widely researched and assessed using a variety of measures, but researchers have neglected the areas of trust, stress, and boredom. We make recommendations for use of particular measures and the construction of new measures. Conclusion: It is predicted that, given the changing role of ATCOs and profound future airspace requirements and configurations, issues of stress, trust, and boredom will become more significant. Researchers should develop and/or refine existing measures of all five key HF issues to assess their impact on ATCO performance. Furthermore, these issues should be considered in a holistic manner. Application: The current article provides an evaluation of research and measures used in HF research on ATC that will aid research and ATC measurement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0018720809355278

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 240

  1. Adams, B.D., 2003, Trust in automated systems literature review (Report to Department of National Defence, DRDC No. CR-2003-096)
  2. 10.1016/j.ergon.2006.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Annebicque, D., Paper presented at the First International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction
  4. 10.1080/14639220210124067 · DOI
  5. 10.1201/9781420055948.ch39 · doi:10.1201/9781420055948.ch39
  6. 10.1080/00140130600733816 · DOI
  7. Athènes, S., Averty, P., Puechmorel, S. & Delahaye, D.C. ( 2002). Complexity and controller workload: Trying to bridge the gap. In Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics (pp. 56-60). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  8. Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions., 2007, AIRE: Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions
  9. Averty, P., 2004, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 75, 333
  10. Barker, D.R., Paper presented at the 22nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference
  11. Bellorini, A., Paper presented in April at the 8th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology
  12. Bentley, J.W., 1998, Clacton re-organisation and TC East development simulation (No. ATMDC Memorandum 9809)
  13. 10.1207/s15327108ijap0701_1 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/00140130600779744 · DOI
  15. Bolczak, R., Paper presented at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 5th Aviation
  16. 10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Breton, R., 2003, Situational awareness: A review of the concept and its measurement (No. DRDC Valcartier TR 2001-220)
  18. Breton, R., 2007, Measurement of individual and team situation awareness: A critical evaluation of the available metrics and tools and their applicability to command and control environments (Tech. Rep. 2003-283)
  19. Brochard, M., Paper presented at the 1st Council of European Aerospace Societies European Air and Space Conference
  20. Brooker, P., 2003, Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 3, 1
  21. 10.1016/j.ssci.2003.12.002 · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2003.12.002
  22. Brooker, P., 2005, Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 5, 23
  23. 10.1017/S0373463307004596 · doi:10.1017/s0373463307004596
  24. 10.1016/0301-0511(95)05167-8 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Cast., 1998, Consequences of future ATM systems for air traffic controller selection and training: WP1. Current and future systems. In EC FPIV DGVII: Air transport project AI-97-SC.2029
  26. 10.1207/s15327108ijap1402_2 · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap1402_2
  27. Chang, Y.-H., Applied Ergonomics, 42, 123
  28. Charlton, S.G. ( 2002). Selecting measures for human factors tests. In S. G. Charlton & T. G. O’Brien (Eds.), Handbook of human factors testing and evaluation (pp. 37-54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. · doi:10.1201/9781003000815-4
  29. Civil Aviation Authority., 1990, Traffic distribution policy and airport and airspace capacity: The next 15 years (CAA Report CAP 570)
  30. Collet, C., Averty, P., Delhomme, G., Dittmar, A. & Vernet-Maury, E. (2003). Subjective aspects of mental load in air-traffic control. In G. R. J. Hockey, A. W. K. Gaillard, & A. Burov (Eds.), Operator functional state: the assessment and prediction of human performance degradation in complex tasks. New York: Plenum , pp. 23-27.
  31. 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.01.019 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/9780470713181.ch10 · DOI
  33. 10.1037/10690-005 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Costa, G., 1995, Occupational stress and stress prevention in air traffic control
  35. 10.1080/02678379508256564 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s12144-005-1020-y · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s12144-006-1012-6 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00108-9 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/job.4030020406 · DOI
  40. Davies, V.J., Shackleton, D.R. & Parasuraman, R. ( 1983). Monotony and boredom. In G. R. J. Hockey (Ed.), Stress and fatigue in human performance (pp. 1-32). New York: Wiley.
  41. 10.1016/S1290-0958(00)80081-7 · doi:10.1016/s1290-0958(00)80081-7
  42. Di Nocera, F., 2006, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 77, 639
  43. 10.1016/0951-8320(93)90016-R · doi:10.1016/0951-8320(93)90016-r
  44. 10.1201/9781420055948.pt1 · doi:10.1201/9781420055948.pt1
  45. 10.1518/001872006779166316 · DOI
  46. Durso, F.T. & Dattel, A.R. ( 2004). SPAM: The real-time assessment of SA. In S. Banbury & S. Tremblay (Eds.), A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory and application (pp. 137 -154). Aldershot,UK: Ashgate.
  47. Durso, F.T., Paper presented at the 75th Annual Aerospace Medical Association Scientific Meeting
  48. Durso, F.T., 1999, Situation awareness as a predictor of performance in en route air traffic controllers (DOT/FAA/ AM-99/3)
  49. 10.1207/s15327108ijap0802_6 · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0802_6
  50. Dzindolet, M.T., Beck, H.P. & Pierce, L.G. ( 2006). Adaptive automation: Building flexibility into human-machine systems. In C. S. Burke, L. G. Pierce, & E. Salas (Eds.), Understanding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments (pp. 213-245). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. · DOI
  51. Edwards, E. ( 1972). Man and machine: Systems for safety. In Proceedings of British Airline Pilots Association Technical Symposium (pp. 21-36). London : British Airline Pilots Association.
  52. 10.1518/155534308X377108 · DOI
  53. Endsley, M.R. ( 1987). The application of human factors to the development of expert systems for advanced cockpits. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 1388-1392). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. · DOI
  54. Endsley, M.R., 1987, SAGAT: A methodology for the measurement of situation awareness (NOR DOC 87-83)
  55. 10.1518/001872095779049543 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Endsley, M.R. ( 1996). Automation and situation awareness. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 163-181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  57. Endsley, M.R., 1997, Communication and situation awareness in the aviation system: A presentation to the Aviation Communication: A Multi-Cultural Forum
  58. Endsley, M.R., Paper presented at the High Consequence Systems Surety Conference
  59. Endsley, M.R. ( 2006). Situation awareness. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (3rd ed., pp. 528-542). New York: Wiley. · DOI
  60. Endsley, M.R., Paper presented at the 1999 Digital Aviation Systems Conference
  61. Endsley, M.R., 1997, Situation awareness, information dominance, and information warfare (No. AL/CF-TR-1997-0156)
  62. 10.1518/001872095779064555 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Endsley, M.R., 1997, Effect of free flight conditions on controller performance, workload and situation awareness: A preliminary investigation of changes in locus of control using existing technology (No. DOT/FAA/CT-TN 97/12)
  64. 10.2514/atcq.6.1.21 · DOI
  65. Endsley, M.R., Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
  66. Endsley, M.R. & Smolensky, M. ( 1998). Situation awareness in air traffic control: The picture . In M. Smolensky & E. Stein (Eds.), Human factors in air traffic control (pp. 115-154). New York: Academic Press.
  67. Endsley, M.R., Paper presented at the Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation: User Centered Design for the New Millennium Conference
  68. EUROCONTROL, the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation., 1990, Airspace model simulation of the UK New En Route Centre (NERC) (No. EEC Task No. AF26, EEC Note No. 18/90)
  69. EUROCONTROL, the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation., 2003, CAATS: Cooperative Approach to Air Traffic Services publishable final activity report (Tech. Rep. ISCAAE-061760-5LL / WP0.7-ISD-V1.0-D-PU-065)
  70. EUROCONTROL, the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation., 2003, The development of situation awareness measures in ATM systems
  71. EUROCONTROL, the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation., 2004, A tool for the assessment of the impact of change in automated ATM systems on mental workload
  72. Farmer, E.W., 2003, Review of workload measurement, analysis and interpretation methods (Report for EUROCONTROL Integra Program)
  73. Federal Aviation Administration ., 2003, Federal Aviation Administration flight plan 2004-2008
  74. Felici, M., Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Rapid Integration of Software Engineering Techniques
  75. Galster, S.M., Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  76. 10.1207/S15327108IJAP1101_5 · DOI
  77. Goillau, P., 2003, Guidelines for trust in future ATM systems: Measures
  78. 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.04.004 · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2007.04.004
  79. Guiost, B., 2007, Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 687
  80. Hackman, J.R., 1980, Work redesign
  81. Hadley, J., 2000, Interfacility boundary adjustment (No. DOT/FAA/CT-TN00/06)
  82. Hancock, P. A., 2001, Stress, workload, and fatigue
  83. 10.2514/atcq.6.1.45 · doi:10.2514/atcq.6.1.45
  84. 10.1080/10508410802168333 · DOI
  85. 10.1016/S1270-9638(02)00011-1 · DOI
  86. Hawkins, F.H., Breakdown in human adaptation to stress: Towards a multidisciplinary approach (Vol. 1, for the Commission of the European Communities)
  87. 10.1348/000712605X38369 · DOI
  88. 10.1080/10615800801911305 · DOI
  89. Hilburn, B., Paper presented at the 4th International Seminar on ATM R&D
  90. Hilburn, B. & Jorna, P.G.A.M. (2001). Workload and air traffic control. In P. A. Hancock & P. A. Desmond (Eds.), Stress, workload and fatigue (pp. 384-394). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. · doi:10.1201/b12791-2.9
  91. 10.1080/14639220210159726 · DOI
  92. 10.1207/s15327108ijap0801_1 · DOI
  93. 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.010 · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.010
  94. Hopkin, V.D., 1995, Human factors in air traffic control
  95. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1988.tb01141.x · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1988.tb01141.x
  96. International Civil Aviation Organization., 1993, Human Factors Digest No. 8: Human factors in air traffic control
  97. International Civil Aviation Organization., 2005, Global air traffic management operational concept
  98. International Civil Aviation Organization., 2007, ICAO Journal, 62, 5
  99. Jeannot, E., 2003, The development of situation awareness measures in ATM systems
  100. Joint Planning and Development Office., 2007, Concept of operations for the Next Generation Air Transportation System Version 2.0
  101. 10.1080/1463922021000054335 · DOI · Paper page
  102. 10.1002/1520-6564(200023)10:4<409::AID-HFM4>3.0.CO;2-V · doi:10.1002/1520-6564(200023)10:4<409::aid-hfm4>3.0.co;2-v
  103. 10.1016/j.ergon.2006.01.008 · DOI
  104. 10.1080/10508410701527860 · DOI
  105. 10.1207/s15327566ijce0303_1 · DOI
  106. 10.1207/S15327566IJCE0501_3 · DOI
  107. Kauppinen, S., Proceedings of the 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference
  108. Kelly, C., 2003, Guidelines for trust in future ATM systems: A literature review
  109. King, R.E., 2007, Operational use of the air traffic selection and training battery (No. ADA468134)
  110. 10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00049-0 · DOI
  111. 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00047-3 · doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00047-3
  112. Kirwan, B., Paper presented at the FAA/Eurocontrol ATM R&D Seminar
  113. Kirwan, B., Rodgers, M. & Schafer, D. ( 2005). Introduction. In B. Kirwan , M. Rodgers, & D. Schafer (Eds.), Human factors impacts in air traffic management (pp. 3-18). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  114. Kirwan, B. & Rothaug, J. ( 2001). Finding ways to fit the automation to the air traffic controller. In M. Hanson (Ed.), Contemporary ergonomics (pp. 459-464). London: Taylor & Francis.
  115. Kokorian, A., Paper presented at the 8th International Symposium of the Australian Aviation Psychology Association
  116. 10.2514/atcq.16.4.313 · doi:10.2514/atcq.16.4.313
  117. Kopardekar, P., Paper presented at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit
  118. Kopardekar, P., Paper presented at the 26th International Council for Aeronautical Sciences Congress
  119. 10.1080/001401399185036 · doi:10.1080/001401399185036
  120. 10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.889825 · DOI
  121. 10.1080/001401399184839 · DOI
  122. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1700(199610)12:4<211::AID-SMI704>3.0.CO;2-1 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1700(199610)12:4<211::aid-smi704>3.0.co;2-1
  123. Langan-Fox J. ( 2003). Skill acquisition and the development of the team mental model: An integrative approach to analysing organizational teams, task and context. In M. West, D. Tjosvold, & K. G. Smith (Eds.), International handbook of organizational teamwork and co-operative working (pp. 321-360). London: Wiley. · DOI
  124. 10.1002/hfm.20004 · DOI
  125. 10.1016/j.ergon.2009.04.002 · DOI
  126. 10.1518/001872000779656534 · DOI · Paper page
  127. 10.1080/02678379708256834 · DOI
  128. 10.1002/acp.1258 · DOI
  129. Langan-Fox, J., Keynote speech presented by J. Langan-Fox at the Smart Decision Making for Clean Skies Conference
  130. 10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00016-6 · DOI
  131. 10.1080/00140139208967392 · DOI · Paper page
  132. 10.1016/j.aip.2007.07.003 · DOI
  133. 10.1207/s15327108ijap1501_3 · DOI
  134. 10.1518/001872007X197017 · DOI · Paper page
  135. Low , I., 2004, A tool for the assessment of the impact of change in automated ATM systems on mental workload
  136. Mackie, R.R. (1984). Research relevance and the information glut. In F. A. Muckler (Ed.), Human factors review 1984 (pp. 1-12). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
  137. Madsen, M. & Gregor, S. (2000). Measuring human-computer trust. In G. Gable & M. Vitale (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (p. 53). Brisbane, Australia: Information Systems Management Research Centre.
  138. Manning, C., 2001, Investigating the validity of performance and objective workload evaluation research (POWER) (No. DOT/FAA/AM-01/10)
  139. 10.2514/atcq.10.2.69 · doi:10.2514/atcq.10.2.69
  140. 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.964 · DOI · Paper page
  141. Masalonis, A.J., IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man & Cybernetics
  142. 10.1080/0014013031000121986 · DOI
  143. 10.1108/09653560510618375 · doi:10.1108/09653560510618375
  144. 10.1037/1528-3542.2.4.315 · DOI · Paper page
  145. 10.1002/smi.2460020107 · DOI
  146. May, P., Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  147. McClernon, C.K., Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  148. 10.1080/00140139608964487 · DOI
  149. Meister, D., 1986, Human factors testing and evaluation
  150. Meister, D., 2004, Conceptual foundations of human factors measurement
  151. Melton, C.E., 1982, Physiological stress in air traffic controllers: A review (No. FAA/AM-82/17)
  152. Mercer, J., Paper presented at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit
  153. Metzger, U., Galster, S.M. & Parasuraman, R. (1999). Effects of a conflict detection aid and traffic density on controller mental workload and performance in an ATC task simulating free flight. In R. S. Jensen, B. Cox, J. D. Callister, & R. Lavis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 541-547). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
  154. Metzger, U., Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting
  155. 10.1518/001872001775870421 · DOI · Paper page
  156. 10.1518/0018720053653802 · DOI
  157. 10.1207/s15327108ijap1604_1 · DOI
  158. 10.1006/jvlc.1999.0128 · DOI
  159. Nadler, E., 1990, A simulation study of the effects of communication delay on air traffic control (No. DOT/FAA/CT-90/6)
  160. Nesthus, T., 2006, An assessment of commuting risk factors for air traffic control specialists (No. A758064)
  161. 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.007 · DOI
  162. Nunes, A., Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting
  163. 10.1080/00140130701276640 · DOI
  164. 10.1016/0001-6918(81)90033-0 · DOI · Paper page
  165. 10.1207/s15327108ijap1603_4 · DOI
  166. Prevot, T., Paper presented at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit
  167. Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics., 2002, National Airspace System: Concept of operations and vision for the future of aviation
  168. Rantanen, E., 2004, Development and validation of objective performance and workload measures in air traffic control (No. AHFD-04-19/FAA-04-7)
  169. 10.1207/s15327108ijap1504_3 · DOI
  170. 10.1037/e664922007-001 · doi:10.1037/e664922007-001
  171. Richter, P., 2002, Zeitschrift fuer Arbeitswissenschaft, 1, 67
  172. Riley, V. ( 1994). A theory of operator reliance on automation. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Recent research and trends (pp. 8-14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  173. Rockstuhl, T., 2002, BMS-II- Modifikationen und Beanspruchungsmessung in Call Centers [Modifications of BMS-II and the measurement of strain in call centers]. Unpublished thesis
  174. Rodgers, M.D. & Nye, L.G. ( 1993). Factors associated with severity of operational errors at air route traffic control centers. In M. D. Rodgers (Ed.), An examination of the operational error database for air route traffic control centers (DOT/FAA/ FAA/AM-98/22) (pp. 243-256). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aviation Medicine.
  175. Roessingh, J., 2004, A measure to assess the impact of automation on teamwork
  176. Rognin, L., Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics
  177. 10.1097/00006842-199307000-00001 · DOI
  178. 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.006 · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.006
  179. Ruitenberg, B. ( 1999). Automation and the air traffic controller: human factors considerations. In M. W. Scerbo & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation technology and human performance (pp. 102-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  180. 10.1518/001872008X288457 · DOI · Paper page
  181. 10.1518/001872095779049525 · DOI · Paper page
  182. 10.1207/s15327108ijap1602_3 · DOI
  183. 10.1080/14639220701561775 · DOI · Paper page
  184. 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  185. 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.010 · DOI · Paper page
  186. Salvendy, G. ( 1999). Foreword. In N. A. Stanton & M. S. Young (Eds.), A guide to methodology in ergonomics: Designing for human use (p. ix). London: Taylor & Francis.
  187. Scerbo, M.W. ( 1996). Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications. Human factors in transportation (pp. 37-63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  188. 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.012 · DOI
  189. Sheridan, T.B., 2002, Humans and automation: System design and research issues
  190. Sheridan, T.B., Paper presented at the 2nd Symposium on Resilience Engineering
  191. Sheridan, T.B., Paper presented at the 80th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Aerospace Medical Association
  192. 10.1159/000289065 · DOI
  193. 10.1207/s15327108ijap0704_6 · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0704_6
  194. 10.1080/00221309.1993.9711153 · DOI
  195. Smith, E.C., Paper presented at the 26th Digital Avionics Systems Conference
  196. Sprong, K.R., Paper presented at the 6th USA/Europe ATM R&D Seminar
  197. 10.2514/1.38798 · doi:10.2514/1.38798
  198. Staal, M.A., 2004, Stress, cognition, and human performance: A literature review and conceptual framework (No. NASA Technical Memorandum 2004-212824)
  199. Stager, P., Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting
  200. Stanton, N. (2005). Human factors and ergonomics methods. In N. Stanton, A. Hedge, K. Brookhuis, E. Salas , & H. Hendrick (Eds.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods (pp. 1-19). Boca Raton, FL: CRC. · DOI · Paper page

200 of 240 shown

Cited by

See all 56

Metadata

Authors
Langan-Fox, J., Sankey, M. J., & Canty, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,
  • Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Venue
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2009-10
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
595-637
ISSN
  • 0018-7208
  • 1547-8181
DOI
10.1177/0018720809355278
Cited by
56
References
9
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.