Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress, and worry.

Gerald Matthews, Sian E. Campbell, Shona Falconer, Lucy A. Joyner, Jane Huggins, Kirby Gilliland, Rebecca A. Grier, Joel S. Warm·2002·Emotion

Abstract

Subjective state constructs are defined within the traditional domains of affect, motivation, and cognition. Currently, there is no overarching state model that interrelates constructs within the different domains. This article reports 3 studies that provide converging evidence for 3 fundamental state dimensions labeled task engagement, distress, and worry that integrate constructs across the traditional domains. Study 1 differentiated the state dimensions by factor analysis of the scales of the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (G. Matthews et al., 1999). Study 2 showed differential state response to performance of tasks making different cognitive demands. Study 3 showed that states are correlated with differing patterns of appraisal and coping. The 3 stress state dimensions provide a general descriptive framework consistent with transactional accounts of stress and performance.

Cites (9)

  1. “Stress: appraisal and coping,”
    Folkman, Susan · 2013 · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine
  2. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
    1988 · Advances in Psychology
  3. Emotion And Adaptation
    Lazarus, Richard S · 1991
  4. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
    Kluger, Avraham N., DeNisi, Angelo · 1996 · Psychological Bulletin
  5. Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states
    Watson, David, Clark, Lee A. · 1984 · Psychological Bulletin
  6. Multidimensional assessment of coping: a critical evaluation
    Endler, Norman S., Parker, James D. · 1990 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  7. Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem.
    Heatherton, Todd F., Polivy, Janet · 1991 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  8. Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework
    Robert J. Hockey, G. · 1997 · Biological Psychology
  9. Test Anxiety
    1998 · Perspectives on Individual Differences

Show all 9 references

Cited by (10)

  1. Sustaining attention to simple tasks: A meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention.
    Langner, Robert, Eickhoff, Simon B. · 2013 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. Fundamentals of physiological computing
    Fairclough, Stephen H. · 2009 · Interacting with Computers
  3. EEG power spectral measures of cognitive workload: A meta‐analysis
    Chikhi, Samy, Matton, Nadine, Blanchet, Sophie · 2022 · Psychophysiology
  4. Rumination, Depression, and Metacognition: the S‐REF Model
    Matthews, Gerald, Wells, Adrian · 2003 · Depressive Rumination
  5. Neuroticism from the Top Down: Psychophysiology and Negative Emotionality
    Matthews, G. · 2004 · On the Psychobiology of Personality

See all 594

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress, and worry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//1528-3542.2.4.315
The paper
Matthews, G., Campbell, S. E., Falconer, S., Joyner, L. A., Huggins, J., Gilliland, K., Grier, R. A., & Warm, J. S. (2002). Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress, and worry. Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1037//1528-3542.2.4.315

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.