Cited by 83Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlWorkplace Health and Well-being

Cardiovascular Reactivity to Work Stress Predicts Subsequent Onset of Hypertension: The Air Traffic Controller Health Change Study

Ming, Eileen E., Adler, Gail K., Kessler, Ronald C., Fogg, Louis F., Matthews, Karen A., Herd, J. Alan, Rose, Robert M.·2004·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The hypothesis that increased blood pressure reactivity to stress is an early risk marker of hypertension was tested in a 1994 follow-up of the 1974 to 1978 Air Traffic Controller Health Change Study sample. METHODS: Assessments in 1974 to 1978 included physical examinations and recordings (every 20 minutes for 5 hours) of both workload (planes within controller airspace) and blood pressure reactivity. Individual differences in reactivity were used to predict 1994 self-report of ever having been told by a physician to take antihypertensive medication, assessed in a telephone survey of 218 respondents who were normotensive or stage 1 hypertensive in 1974 to 1978. RESULTS: Each SD increase in baseline systolic reactivity was associated with a 1.7 (p <.019) increase in the relative-odds of 1994 hypertension, after controlling for age, body mass index, and clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressure at clinical examination, with effects comparable for baseline normotensives and stage 1 hypertensives. CONCLUSION: A 20-year follow-up of originally normotensive and stage I hypertensive workers suggests that increased systolic blood pressure reactivity to work stress is associated with long-term risk of hypertension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.psy.0000132872.71870.6d

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ming, E. E., Adler, G. K., Kessler, R. C., Fogg, L. F., Matthews, K. A., Herd, J. A., & Rose, R. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rose, Robert M.
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2004-07
Volume
66
Issue
4
Pages
459-465
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046749354
Cited by
83
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-17119, T32MH017119)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
blood pressure reactivity, occupational stress, hypertension onset, air traffic controllers, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive medication use, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Aerospace Medicine, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular System, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypertension, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Diseases, Probability, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Systole, Biomarkers, Workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review