Boundaries and Role Conflict When Work and Family are Colocated: A Communication Network and Symbolic Interaction Approach
Abstract
As virtual workplaces and homework programs become more common, workers often find themselves inhabiting multiple worlds and multiple roles simultaneously. For these individuals, boundary transitions are both more frequent and more challenging. This paper expands current theory on work-related boundary transitions by: (1) conceptualizing role conflict in the logic of dynamic communication networks, and (2) reconceptualizing ritual and routine behavior in boundary transitions as not simply aids to mental transitions but also as communicative and symbolic performance that is oriented toward other role senders. Underlying the framework is the concept of time-space paths (Giddens, 1979; Heidegger, 1996) as critical elements of role boundary identification and demarcation. This paper contributes to a better understanding of boundary issues for homeworkers by using a communication framework and emphasizing the agency that homeworkers have to mold others' expectations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
With high monitoring expectations, the individual may become locked into their work domain schemas, which may not be well suited for deeply enacting their nonwork domain roles.
“Furthermore, with high monitoring expectations, the individual may become locked into their work domain schemas, which may not be well suited for deeply enacting their nonwork domain roles (Shumate & Fulk, 2004).”
From Killing Me Softly: Organizational E-mail Monitoring Expectations’ Impact on Employee and Significant Other Well-Being (2021) · cites this paper as Shumate & Fulk, 2004
Cites
All in a Day's Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259305 · Cited by 3,039 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654311404435 · Cited by 2,361 · see citing works
Stress in remote work: two studies testing the Demand-Control-Person model
Perry, S. J., Rubino, C., & Hunter, E. M. (2018) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2018.1487402 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Becker, W. J., Belkin, L. Y., Conroy, S. A., & Tuskey, S. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206319890655 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“Furthermore, with high OEEM, individuals may become locked into their work domain schemas, which may not be well suited for deeply enacting their nonwork domain roles (Shumate & Fulk, 2004).”
BackgroundSmit, B. W., Maloney, P. W., Maertz, C. P., & Montag-Smit, T. (2016) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726716636204 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shumate, M., & Fulk, J.
- Affiliations
- North Dakota State University (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shumate, Michelle
- Fulk, Janet
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-74
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2138252386
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 13.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Relations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
- Keywords
- role conflict, home workers, communication networks, symbolic interactionism, agency, virtual workplace
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review