Cited by 122Work-Family Balance ChallengesEmployment, Labor, and Gender StudiesEmotional Labor in Professions

Boundaries and Role Conflict When Work and Family are Colocated: A Communication Network and Symbolic Interaction Approach

Shumate, Michelle, Fulk, Janet·2004·Human Relations

Abstract

As virtual workplaces and homework programs become more common, workers often find themselves inhabiting multiple worlds and multiple roles simultaneously. For these individuals, boundary transitions are both more frequent and more challenging. This paper expands current theory on work-related boundary transitions by: (1) conceptualizing role conflict in the logic of dynamic communication networks, and (2) reconceptualizing ritual and routine behavior in boundary transitions as not simply aids to mental transitions but also as communicative and symbolic performance that is oriented toward other role senders. Underlying the framework is the concept of time-space paths (Giddens, 1979; Heidegger, 1996) as critical elements of role boundary identification and demarcation. This paper contributes to a better understanding of boundary issues for homeworkers by using a communication framework and emphasizing the agency that homeworkers have to mold others' expectations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0018726704042714

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With high monitoring expectations, the individual may become locked into their work domain schemas, which may not be well suited for deeply enacting their nonwork domain roles.

    “Furthermore, with high monitoring expectations, the individual may become locked into their work domain schemas, which may not be well suited for deeply enacting their nonwork domain roles (Shumate & Fulk, 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shumate, M., & Fulk, J.
Affiliations
  • North Dakota State University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
  • Shumate, Michelle
  • Fulk, Janet
Venue
Human Relations
Published
2004-01
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
55-74
ISSN
  • 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-282X
OpenAlex
W2138252386
Cited by
122
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
13.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
Keywords
role conflict, home workers, communication networks, symbolic interactionism, agency, virtual workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review