Cited by 2,361Innovative Education and Learning PracticesAdult and Continuing Education TopicsTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects

Akkerman, Sanne F., Bakker, Arthur·2011·Review of Educational Research

Abstract

Diversity and mobility in education and work present a paramount challenge that needs better conceptualization in educational theory. This challenge has been addressed by educational scholars with the notion of boundaries, particularly by the concepts of boundary crossing and boundary objects. Although studies on boundary crossing and boundary objects emphasize that boundaries carry learning potential, it is not explicated in what way they do so. By reviewing this literature, this article offers an understanding of boundaries as dialogical phenomena. The review of the literature reveals four potential learning mechanisms that can take place at boundaries: identification, coordination, reflection, and transformation. These mechanisms show various ways in which sociocultural differences and resulting discontinuities in action and interaction can come to function as resources for development of intersecting identities and practices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0034654311404435

Cites

246 of 246 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The multiple voices meeting at boundaries can trigger dialogue and negotiation.

    “At the same time, the multiple voices meeting at boundaries can trigger dialogue and negotiation, which can explain why confronting boundaries is recognized as not only challenging but also worthwhile to explore in relation to learning (Akkerman and Bakker 2011).”

    From Unpacking the Role of Boundaries in Computer-Supported Collaborative Teaching (2020) · cites this paper as Akkerman and Bakker 2011

  • Technological boundaries involve the learning mechanisms identification and coordination, as they create situations in which these boundaries need to be reflected on and tackled during the collaboration.

    “The technological boundaries hence involve the learning mechanisms identification and coordination, as it creates situations in which these boundaries need to be reflected on and tackled during the collaboration (Akkerman and Bakker 2011).”

    From Unpacking the Role of Boundaries in Computer-Supported Collaborative Teaching (2020) · cites this paper as Akkerman and Bakker 2011

  • The exact mechanisms taking place at boundaries are seldom specified.

    “Yet, the literature review on boundaries (Akkerman and Bakker 2011) revealed that the exact mechanisms taking place at boundaries are seldom specified, and the authors urge researchers to explicate how and in what way boundaries can support learning and transformation of practices.”

    From Unpacking the Role of Boundaries in Computer-Supported Collaborative Teaching (2020) · cites this paper as Akkerman and Bakker 2011

  • The term boundary is often used relatively unfounded, in situations where discontinuities are expected rather than empirically detected, which is problematic if boundaries should serve as a meaningful analytic concept.

    “Yet, the term”

    From Unpacking the Role of Boundaries in Computer-Supported Collaborative Teaching (2020) · cites this paper as Akkerman and Bakker 2011

  • This corresponds to the mechanisms of coordination and transformation.

    “This correspond to the mechanisms of coordination (i.e., forming cooperative exchanges between practices) and transformation (i.e., co-development of new practices) (Akkerman and Bakker 2011).”

    From Unpacking the Role of Boundaries in Computer-Supported Collaborative Teaching (2020) · cites this paper as Akkerman and Bakker 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Review of Educational Research
Published
2011-06
Volume
81
Issue
2
Pages
132-169
ISSN
  • 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1046
OpenAlex
W2120832154
Cited by
2,361
References
246
Citations by year
2026: 258 · 2025: 204 · 2024: 222 · 2023: 203 · 2022: 202 · 2021: 199 · 2020: 175 · 2019: 170 · 2018: 149 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 136 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 100 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 44
FWCI
246.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universiteit Utrecht
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
boundary crossing, boundary objects, dialogical learning, learning mechanisms, identification, coordination, reflection, transformation, sociocultural diversity, identity construction, work and education, mobility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review