The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Muslim businesswomen doing boundary work: The negotiation of Islam, gender and ethnicity within entrepreneurial contexts
Abstract
This article discusses how female entrepreneurs of Moroccan and Turkish origin in the Netherlands construct their ethnic, gender and entrepreneurial identities in relation to their Muslim identity. We contribute to theory development on the interrelationship of work identities with gender, ethnicity and religion through an intersectional analysis of these women's gender and ethnic identities within their entrepreneurial contexts and in relation to their Muslim identity. We draw on four narratives to illustrate how the women interviewed perform creative boundary work at these hitherto under-researched intersections. Islam is employed as a boundary to let religious norms and values prevail over cultural ones and to make space for individualism, honour and entrepreneurship. Moreover, different individual religious identities are crafted to stretch the boundaries of what is allowed for female entrepreneurs in order to resist traditional, dogmatic interpretations of Islam. Our study contributes to studies on entrepreneurship by showing how these female entrepreneurs gain agency at the crossroads of gender, ethnicity and religion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791611 · Cited by 11,223
The Complexity of Intersectionality
McCall, L. (2005) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/426800 · Cited by 6,682 · cited 1×
“The concept of intersectionality was originally developed to stress the importance of simultaneous categories of oppression that constitute differences in power (Crenshaw, 1997) for particular groups at neglected points of intersection (McCall, 2005).”
BackgroundCarpenter, M. A., Cardon, M. S., McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2011) · In Search of Research Excellence · doi:10.4337/9781849807630.00018 · Cited by 5,213
Narrative Research: Reading, Analysis, and Interpretation
Lieblich, A., Tuval‐Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,251
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998) · doi:10.4135/9781412985253 · Cited by 1,826
Managing Managerial Identities: Organizational Fragmentation, Discourse and Identity Struggle
Sveningsson, S., & Alvesson, M. (2003) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267035610001 · Cited by 1,685
The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-5154 · Cited by 1,358
Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality.
Hoffman, L. M., Lamont, M., & Fournier, M. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076007 · Cited by 1,196
The Economic Sociology of Immigration: Essays on Networks, Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship
Portes, A. (1998) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 1,117
Cited by
Zanoni, P., Janssens, M., Benschop, Y., & Nkomo, S. (2010) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508409350344 · Cited by 593
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Essers, C., & Benschop, Y.
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 403-423
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2155184922
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 35.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Muslim businesswomen doing boundary work: The negotiation of Islam, gender and ethnicity within entrepreneurial contexts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0018726708101042
- The paper
- Essers, C., & Benschop, Y. (2009). Muslim businesswomen doing boundary work: The negotiation of Islam, gender and ethnicity within entrepreneurial contexts. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708101042
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.