The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technology-assisted supplemental work and work-to-family conflict: The role of instrumentality beliefs, organizational expectations and time management
Abstract
People engage in technology-assisted supplemental work (TASW) when they perform role-prescribed tasks at home after regular work hours with the aid of technological tools such as laptops, cell phones, BlackBerries®, and PDAs. Drawing from the technology acceptance model, we hypothesized and found that instrumentality beliefs (perceived usefulness) and organizational expectations (psychological climate) were positively related to TASW. In addition, we hypothesized and found that TASW was positively related to work-to-family conflict. However, time management (setting goals and priorities) moderated the relationship such that people who apply certain time management strategies may reduce the negative influence of TASW on their lives at home.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
All in a Day's Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259305 · Cited by 3,039
10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211644 · Cited by 2,571
College students' time management: Correlations with academic performance and stress.
Macan, T. H., Shahani, C., Dipboye, R. L., & Phillips, A. P. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.760 · Cited by 933 · cited 7×
“Contingency effect for time management Time management includes the skills of 1) setting goals and priorities, 2) mechanics of time management (scheduling and planning of activities), and 3) a preference for organization (Macan, 1994; Macan et al., 1990).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTime management: Test of a process model
Macan, T. H. (1994) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.381 · Cited by 601
Cited by
Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., & Stich, J. (2019) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12169 · Cited by 1,085
Wang, B., Liu, Y., & Parker, S. K. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0127 · Cited by 377
Butts, M. M., Becker, W. J., & Boswell, W. R. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0170 · Cited by 353
The digital workplace and its dark side: An integrative review
Marsh, E., Vallejos, E. P., & Spence, A. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107118 · Cited by 348
Spagnoli, P., Molino, M., Molinaro, D., Giancaspro, M. L., Manuti, A., & Ghislieri, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.620310 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Fenner, G. H., & Renn, R. W.
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-82
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2103746046
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 15.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
