Cited by 1,085Technostress in Professional SettingsStress and Burnout ResearchInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

The technostress trifecta ‐ techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research

Open access
Tarafdar, Monideepa, Cooper, Cary L., Stich, Jean‐François·2019·Information Systems Journal

Abstract

Abstract Technostress—defined as stress that individuals experience due to their use of Information Systems—represents an emerging phenomenon of scholarly investigation. It examines how and why the use of IS causes individuals to experience various demands that they find stressful. This paper develops a framework for guiding future research in technostress experienced by individuals in organizations. We first review and critically analyse the state of current research on technostress reported in journals from the IS discipline and the non‐IS disciplines that study stress in organizations (eg, organizational behaviour and psychological stress). We then develop our framework in the form of the “technostress trifecta”—techno‐eustress, techno‐distress, and Information Systems design principles for technostress. The paper challenges 3 key ideas imbued in the existing technostress literature. First, it develops the argument that, in contrast to negative outcomes, technostress can lead to positive outcomes such as greater effectiveness and innovation at work. Second, it suggests that instead of limiting the role of IS to that of being a stress creator in the technostress phenomenon, it should be expanded to that of enhancing the positive and mitigating the negative effects of technostress through appropriate design. Third, it lays the groundwork for guiding future research in technostress through an interdisciplinary framing that enriches both the IS and the psychological stress literatures through a potential discourse of disciplinary exchange.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/isj.12169

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., & Stich, J.
Affiliations
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises (FR)
Corresponding author
Tarafdar, Monideepa
Venue
Information Systems Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-21
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
6-42
ISSN
  • 1350-1917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2575
OpenAlex
W2769314241
Cited by
1,085
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 382 · 2025: 201 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
29.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Information Systems Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
technostress, information system design, work effectiveness, stress reduction, interdisciplinary research agenda, organizational stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review