The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning, Trust, and Technological Collaboration
Abstract
Companies increasingly collaborate in their technological activities. Collaboration enables firms to learn about uncertain and turbulent technological change, and enhances their ability to deal with novelty. A number of studies reveal the importance for successful collaboration of high levels of inter-personal trust between scientists, engineers, and managers in the different partners. However, these individual relationships are vulnerable to labor turnover and inter-personal difficulties. Using two examples of highly successful technological collaborations, it is argued that the survival of such relationships in the face of these inevitable inter-personal problems requires the establishment of interorganizational trust. Such trust is characterized by community of interest, organizational cultures receptive to external inputs, and widespread and continually supplemented knowledge among employees of the status and purpose of the collaboration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Jarillo, J. C. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090104 · Cited by 2,555
SAPPHO updated - project SAPPHO phase II
Rothwell, R., Freeman, C., Horlsey, A., Jervis, V. T. P., Robertson, A. B., & Townsend, J. (1974) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(74)90010-9 · Cited by 717
External linkages and innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises
Rothwell, R., & Dodgson, M. (1991) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1991.tb00742.x · Cited by 397
Self-citation
Cited by
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281445 · Cited by 3,864
Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration
Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006 · Cited by 1,400
Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures
Inkpen, A. C., & Dinur, A. (1998) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.9.4.454 · Cited by 993
Resources, Knowledge and Influence: The Organizational Effects of Interorganizational Collaboration*
Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2003) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00342 · Cited by 741
Metadata
- Authors
- Dodgson, M.
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-95
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2147455236
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning, Trust, and Technological Collaboration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001872679304600106
- The paper
- Dodgson, M. (1993). Learning, Trust, and Technological Collaboration. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.