Resources, Knowledge and Influence: The Organizational Effects of Interorganizational Collaboration*
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT Inter‐organizational collaboration has been linked to a range of important outcomes for collaborating organizations. The strategy literature emphasizes the way in which collaboration between organizations results in the sharing of critical resources and facilitates knowledge transfer. The learning literature argues that collaboration not only transfers existing knowledge among organizations, but also facilitates the creation of new knowledge and produce synergistic solutions. Finally, research on networks and interorganizational politics suggests that collaboration can help organizations achieve a more central and influential position in relation to other organizations. While these effects have been identified and discussed at some length, little attention has been paid to the relationship between them and the nature of the collaborations that produce them. In this paper, we present the results of a qualitative study that examines the relationship between the effects of interorganizational collaboration and the nature of the collaborations that produce them. Based on our study of the collaborative activities of a small, nongovernmental organization (NGO) in Palestine over a four‐year period, we argue that two dimensions of collaboration – embeddedness and involvement – determine the potential of a collaboration to produce one or more of these effects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two separate articles sharing a coauthor define collaboration by evoking behaviors and outcomes.
“two separate articles that share a coauthor define collaboration by evoking behaviors (Hardy & Phillips, 1998; see also Hardy et al., 2003) and outcomes (Hardy et al., 2005).”
From Collaboration, Coordination, and Cooperation Among Organizations: Establishing the Distinctive Meanings of These Terms Through a Systematic Literature Review (2020) · cites this paper as Hardy et al., 2003
The distinction among collaboration, coordination, and cooperation remains unclear.
“However, the distinction among these terms remains unclear.”
From Collaboration, Coordination, and Cooperation Among Organizations: Establishing the Distinctive Meanings of These Terms Through a Systematic Literature Review (2020) · cites this paper as Hardy, Phillips, and Lawrence (2003)
The amalgamation of collaboration and cooperation in Hardy et al.'s (2003) definition renders limited discriminant validity.
“Hardy et al. (2003: 323) define collaboration as “a cooperative, interorganizational relationship that is negotiated in an ongoing communicative process”; thus, the amalgamation of collaboration and cooperation renders limited discriminant validity.”
From Collaboration, Coordination, and Cooperation Among Organizations: Establishing the Distinctive Meanings of These Terms Through a Systematic Literature Review (2020) · cites this paper as Hardy et al. (2003)
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334 · see citing works
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449 · see citing works
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557 · see citing works
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455 · see citing works
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093 · see citing works
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499 · see citing works
Strategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425 · see citing works
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
Williamson, O. E. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393356 · Cited by 7,151 · see citing works
Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259373 · Cited by 7,111 · see citing works
A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures
Hennart, J. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090406 · Cited by 1,843 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For example, the strategy 3 literature (e.g., Afuah, 2000; Dyer & Singh, 1998; Gulati et al., 2000a; Hamel, 1991; Hamel, Doz & Prahalad, 1989; Hennart, 1988; Teece, 1986; Williamson, 1991) emphasizes its role in helping organizations acquire resources and skills that cannot be produced internally.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840609104803 · Cited by 1,821 · see citing works
Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S. (2004) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400112 · Cited by 682 · see citing works
Castañer, X., & Oliveira, N. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320901565 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of Victoria (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Hardy, Cynthia
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 321-347
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W1654083282
- Cited by
- 741
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 45
- FWCI
- 61.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Keywords
- inter-organizational collaboration, resource sharing, knowledge transfer, knowledge production, organizational learning, interorganizational networks, organizational impact, non-governmental organizations, Palestine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review