Cited by 741Innovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategy and InnovationManagement and Organizational Studies

Resources, Knowledge and Influence: The Organizational Effects of Interorganizational Collaboration*

Open access
Hardy, Cynthia, Phillips, Nelson, Lawrence, Thomas B.·2003·Journal of Management Studies

Abstract

ABSTRACT Inter‐organizational collaboration has been linked to a range of important outcomes for collaborating organizations. The strategy literature emphasizes the way in which collaboration between organizations results in the sharing of critical resources and facilitates knowledge transfer. The learning literature argues that collaboration not only transfers existing knowledge among organizations, but also facilitates the creation of new knowledge and produce synergistic solutions. Finally, research on networks and interorganizational politics suggests that collaboration can help organizations achieve a more central and influential position in relation to other organizations. While these effects have been identified and discussed at some length, little attention has been paid to the relationship between them and the nature of the collaborations that produce them. In this paper, we present the results of a qualitative study that examines the relationship between the effects of interorganizational collaboration and the nature of the collaborations that produce them. Based on our study of the collaborative activities of a small, nongovernmental organization (NGO) in Palestine over a four‐year period, we argue that two dimensions of collaboration – embeddedness and involvement – determine the potential of a collaboration to produce one or more of these effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-6486.00342

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
Corresponding author
Hardy, Cynthia
Venue
Journal of Management Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
321-347
ISSN
  • 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6486
OpenAlex
W1654083282
Cited by
741
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 45
FWCI
61.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
inter-organizational collaboration, resource sharing, knowledge transfer, knowledge production, organizational learning, interorganizational networks, organizational impact, non-governmental organizations, Palestine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review