The Social Construction of Organizational Learning: Conceptual and Practical Issues in the Field
Abstract
The field of organizational learning (OL) has been characterized by a wide diversity of opinions, definitions, and conceptualizations. After discussing difficulties associated with previous conceptualizations of organizational learning, this paper suggests a broader conceptualization which is consistent with and integrates diverse perspectives in the field of OL. To the extent that organizations continuously act and enact their environments, cognitive processes associated with learning continually take place whether the organization recognizes it or not. OL cannot be understood without taking into account the continuous ongoing change of organizational cognitive structures. However, learning is only recognized when an observer identifies and contextualizes those changes. Thus, organizational learning can be interpreted as a social construction which transforms acquired cognition into accountable abstract knowledge. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of this conceptualization of learning on management practice and organizational research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As actors become more deeply embedded in the extant social networks of their organizations, the extent to which they are exposed to new sources of information and ideas will diminish, thus limiting opportunities for learning.
“It follows from the social learning perspective that, as actors become more deeply embedded in the extant social networks of their organizations, the extent to which they are exposed to new sources of information and ideas will diminish, thus limiting opportunities for learning.”
From The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension (2017) · cites this paper as Nicolini and Meznar 1995
Cites
Organizational Adaptation and Environmental Selection-Interrelated Processes of Change
Levinthal, D. A. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.140 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Individual learning and organizational routine: Emerging connections
Cohen, M. D. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.135 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Organizational learning capability: A proposal of measurement
Jerez-Gómez, P., Céspedes-Lorente, J., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.002 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Organizational Learning: Diverging Communities of Practice?
Easterby-Smith, M., Snell, R., & Gherardi, S. (1998) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507698293001 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension
Pillai, K. G., Hodgkinson, G. P., Kalyanaram, G., & Nair, S. R. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12085 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
(2012) · Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology · doi:10.1177/1756283x10363751 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nicolini, D., & Meznar, M. B.
- Affiliations
- Organizational Consultant, Florence, Italy.
- Arizona State University (US)
- ORCID
- Nicolini, Davide
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 727-746
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2115785687
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 9.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Relations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Keywords
- organizational learning, social construction of knowledge, organizational cognition, cognitive structure, organizational change, abstract knowledge, management practices, conceptualization of learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review