Cited by 344Organizational Learning and LeadershipManagement and Organizational StudiesInnovative Education and Learning Practices

The Social Construction of Organizational Learning: Conceptual and Practical Issues in the Field

Nicolini, Davide, Meznar, Martin B.·1995·Human Relations

Abstract

The field of organizational learning (OL) has been characterized by a wide diversity of opinions, definitions, and conceptualizations. After discussing difficulties associated with previous conceptualizations of organizational learning, this paper suggests a broader conceptualization which is consistent with and integrates diverse perspectives in the field of OL. To the extent that organizations continuously act and enact their environments, cognitive processes associated with learning continually take place whether the organization recognizes it or not. OL cannot be understood without taking into account the continuous ongoing change of organizational cognitive structures. However, learning is only recognized when an observer identifies and contextualizes those changes. Thus, organizational learning can be interpreted as a social construction which transforms acquired cognition into accountable abstract knowledge. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of this conceptualization of learning on management practice and organizational research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001872679504800701

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As actors become more deeply embedded in the extant social networks of their organizations, the extent to which they are exposed to new sources of information and ideas will diminish, thus limiting opportunities for learning.

    “It follows from the social learning perspective that, as actors become more deeply embedded in the extant social networks of their organizations, the extent to which they are exposed to new sources of information and ideas will diminish, thus limiting opportunities for learning.”

    From The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension (2017) · cites this paper as Nicolini and Meznar 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nicolini, D., & Meznar, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Organizational Consultant, Florence, Italy.
  • Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Human Relations
Published
1995-07
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
727-746
ISSN
  • 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-282X
OpenAlex
W2115785687
Cited by
344
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
FWCI
9.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Keywords
organizational learning, social construction of knowledge, organizational cognition, cognitive structure, organizational change, abstract knowledge, management practices, conceptualization of learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review