Cited by 194Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityEducation and Labor Relations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incarceration and Racial Inequality in Men's Employment

Western, Bruce, Pettit, Becky·2000·ILR Review

Abstract

To estimate employment-population ratios for black and white men with an adjustment for incarceration—a factor overlooked by most research on employment inequality—the authors combine data from surveys of prisons and jails with data from the Current Population Survey. This adjustment significantly reduces estimated employment rates for African Americans, young workers, and young high school dropouts. The authors find that employment among young black male high school dropouts steadily declined between 1982 and 1996 despite periods of very low unemployment in the labor market as a whole. Standard labor force data, which include no incarceration data, understate black-white inequality in employment among young dropouts by about 45%.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001979390005400101

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1997, Survey of Jail Inmates, 1978. Computer file, ICPSR
  2. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1997, Survey of Inmates of Local Jails, 1983, 1989. Computer file, ICPSR
  3. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1997, Census of State and Federal Correctional Facilities, 1995
  4. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1994, October 1993, February 1997c. Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities, 1986, 1991, 1979
  5. Bureau of the Census, 1982, March Current Population Surveys
  6. Census of Population and Housing, 1980, Public Use Microdata Samples. Computer file
  7. Census of Population and Housing, 1990, Public Use Microdata Samples. Computer file
  8. 10.2307/1061350 · DOI
  9. Gilliard Darrell K., Beck Allen J., 1998. “Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 1997.” Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin, NCJ 167247.
  10. Moss Philip, 1991, Why Black Men Are Doing Worse in the Labor Market: A Review of Supply Side and Demand-Side Explanations
  11. Myers Samuel L., 1989, The Question of Discrimination: Racial Inequality in the U.S. Labor Market, 81

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Western, B., & Pettit, B.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Venue
ILR Review
Published
2000-10
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
3-16
ISSN
  • 0019-7939 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-271X
OpenAlex
W2027359074
Cited by
192
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
48.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Industrial and Labor Relations Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Education and Labor Relations
Keywords
incarceration, racial inequality, employment, black-white wage gap, African American men, young workers, high school dropout, employment-to-population ratio, labor market inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review