The Effect of Employer Networks on Workplace Innovation and Training
Abstract
If innovative work practices improve performance, why does the intensity of their adoption vary substantially across establishments? Following a lead suggested by some sociological studies, the authors empirically investigate the role of social networks (ties to other organizations) in the organizational learning associated with diffusion of innovative work practices. Using establishment data on formal affiliation and other network measures, they find that managerial participation in networks—specifically, in industry and cross-industry associations, civic organizations, and the internal networks of multi-unit firms—positively affected both the probability that high-performance work practices and employee training programs would be adopted and, where they were adopted, the intensity of their adoption. Furthermore, multiple affiliations raised the likelihood that an establishment would pursue an intensive approach to work reorganization and training.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Networks are equally important for learning about innovative work practices that other organisations have developed or adopted.
“Networks are not only critical for accessing knowledge to create in-house innovations or for the diffusion of technological innovation but they are equally important for learning about innovative work practices that other organisations have developed or adopted (Erickson and Jacoby, 2003).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Erickson and Jacoby, 2003
Cites
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809 · cited 2× · see citing works
“(Hansen 1999).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x · Cited by 1,747 · see citing works
Delmas, M. A., & Pekovic, S. (2013) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1827 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
- Authors
- Erickson, C. L., & Jacoby, S. M.
- Venue
- ILR Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-223
- ISSN
- 0019-7939 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-271X
- OpenAlex
- W2134580592
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 15.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Industrial and Labor Relations Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Keywords
- workplace innovation, high-performance work practices, employee training programs, organizational learning, diffusion of innovations, trade associations, civic organizations, multi-unit firms, work reorganization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review