The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Choice of Major: The Changing (Unchanging) Gender Gap
Abstract
Within the arts, sciences, and engineering fields, differences between men and women in choice of college major have not lessened in the past two decades. In this paper, detailed data on choice of major and individual scores on the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) are used to examine the extent to which observed differences between men and women reflect the effects of pre-collegiate preparation (as reflected in SAT scores), as contrasted with a panoply of other forces. One conclusion is that there is a widening divide between the life sciences and math/physical science fields in their relative attractiveness to men and women. Differences in SAT scores account for only part of the observed gap, and an array of residual forces—including differences in preferences, labor market expectations, and gender-specific effects of the college experience—account for the main part of today's gender gaps in choice of academic major.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The effects of gender stereotypic and counter-stereotypic textbook images on science performance
Good, J. J., Woodzicka, J. A., & Wingfield, L. C. (2010) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224540903366552 · Cited by 263
Are Some Degrees Worth More than Others? Evidence from college admission cutoffs in Chile
Hastings, J., Neilson, C., & Zimmerman, S. (2013) · doi:10.3386/w19241 · Cited by 234
Field of Study in College and Lifetime Earnings in the United States
Kim, C., Tamborini, C. R., & Sakamoto, A. (2015) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.1177/0038040715602132 · Cited by 162
The Earnings Benefits of Majoring in STEM Fields Among High Achieving Minority Students
Melguizo, T., & Wolniak, G. C. (2012) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9238-z · Cited by 139
The impact of major on college persistence among freshmen
Leppel, K. (2001) · Higher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1004189906367 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner, S. E., & Bowen, W. G.
- Venue
- ILR Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 289-313
- ISSN
- 0019-7939 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-271X
- OpenAlex
- W2123067832
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Choice of Major: The Changing (Unchanging) Gender Gap. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001979399905200208
- The paper
- Turner, S. E., & Bowen, W. G. (1999). Choice of Major: The Changing (Unchanging) Gender Gap. ILR Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399905200208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.