Cited by 16Migration, Health and TraumaEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugeesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

How effective is group intervention in the treatment for unaccompanied and accompanied refugee minors with mental health difficulties: A systematic review

Hutchinson, Ryan, King, Natalie, Majumder, Pallab·2022·International Journal of Social Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Unaccompanied refugee minors (URM) are at significantly higher risk of trauma exposure and mental illness. Research examining the most effective treatments for this population is limited. Aims: To study the available research evidence on outcomes from various group interventions in this population. The objective is to investigate if these can be used clinically in future interventions. Methods: Systematic review was carried out for patient outcomes where group therapy was used as treatment in URM. Studies with ARM (Accompanied refugee minors) were included because of similarities between these groups and because many studies were mixed population. Results: Seventeen papers met eligibility criteria with a total of N = 1,119 participants. About 80% studies with a quantitative component reported improvements, and 69% of the studies that carried out statistical analyses reported statistically significant improvements in mental health symptoms. Every qualitative measure reported positive outcome for the participants. Studies with URM tended to show improved outcomes more often than studies exclusively with ARM. Conclusions: The evidence demonstrates the efficacy of group therapy in improving mental health outcomes, although the number of studies with robust methodology is small. Group intervention has potential to improve engagement and outcomes of URM with mental illness. Future direction for research is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00207640211057727

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hutchinson, R., King, N., & Majumder, P.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Majumder, Pallab
Venue
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Published
2021-11-25
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
484-499
ISSN
  • 0020-7640 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2854
OpenAlex
W3214811021
Cited by
16
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Social Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
unaccompanied refugee children, group therapy, group intervention, psychotherapy, trauma exposure, mental illness, treatment efficacy, refugee mental health
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Refugees, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Minors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review