CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 298Corporate Management and LeadershipPublic Administration and Political AnalysisTeam Dynamics and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 39 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Operationalizing the definition of e-leadership: identifying the elements of e-leadership.

Van Wart, Montgomery, Roman, Alexandru, Wang, XiaoHu, Liu, Cheol·2019·International Review of Administrative Sciences
DOI 10.1177/0020852316681446
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The effects of the ongoing digital revolution have been profound and have been studied in many contexts such as government interaction with the public (e-participation) and administrative structures (e-administration). However, the study of how the digital revolution has changed leaders’ interactions with followers via information and communication technologies (ICTs) has been modest, and the theory building in organizational studies and public administration has been, for the most part, nonexistent. A major reason for this lack of progress is the inability to produce an operational definition of e-leadership that spans telework, team, and enterprise settings. The article examines an exploratory case study to propose an operational definition based on six factors (or broad e-competencies) for e-leadership. Research limitations and future research opportunities are discussed. Points for practitioners E-leadership, technology-mediated leadership, has become critically important for leaders at all levels, both inside and outside of the organization. E-leadership is as much about blending technologies and traditional communication as it is about simply using more ICT-mediated communication. While there is a lot of consistency in the types of leadership skills needed in traditional and virtual environments, they are not the same and the differences are critical to success and failure. The areas in which competence in e-skills were most important included: e-communication, e-social skills, e-team building, e-change management, e-technology skills, and e-trustworthiness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0020852316681446

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bakar NA, 2016, Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 88, 176
  2. Fernandez B, 2015, Journal of Applied Research, 31, 1693
  3. French J, 1959, Studies in Social Power
  4. Government Business Council, 2015, Delivering on Digital Government: A Candid Survey of Federal Managers
  5. Grossman L, 2014, Time, 184, 40
  6. Holzer M, 2014, Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2013–2014)
  7. Savolainen T, 2014, Journal of Global Business Issues, 8, 45
  8. US Digital Service, 2016, US Digital Services Playbook
  9. Van Wart M, 2011, The Dynamics of Leadership

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–297 of 297

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Van Wart, M., Roman, A., Wang, X., & Liu, C.
Affiliations
  • Professor, California State University San Bernardino, USA
  • California State University, San Bernardino (US)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • KDI School of Public Policy and Management (KR)
ORCID
Venue
International Review of Administrative Sciences
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2017-02-28
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
80-97
ISSN
  • 0020-8523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7226
DOI
10.1177/0020852316681446
OpenAlex
W2592008876
Cited by
298
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2018: 3
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • International Review of Administrative Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • KDI Central Archives (Korea Development Institute) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
digital leadership, operational definitions, information and communication technologies, remote work, virtual teams, digital communication, digital revolution, public sector leadership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review