The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grounded Theory and Organizational Research
Abstract
Grounded theory is an inductive, theory discovery methodology that allows the researcher to develop a theoretical account of the general features of a topic while simultaneously grounding the account in empirical observations or data (Glaser & Strauss, 1967). This article explicates the utility of a grounded theory approach to research on work organizations. Following a general introduction to the grounded theory method, the authors'review of the organizational literature using grounded theory illustrates the variety of issues and topics studied through this approach. The authors describe and explain specific strategies for conducting grounded theory research in and on organizations, including note taking and note writing, concept discovery, and concept definition and preliminary elaboration of theory. Throughout the article emphasis is placed on grounded theory's ability to facilitate understanding and to identify desirable improvements in work contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Cited by
From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not
Suddaby, R. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083020 · Cited by 2,859
Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure
Jabareen, Y. (2009) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690900800406 · Cited by 1,559
Orlikowski, W. J. (1993) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249774 · Cited by 1,512
Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., & Myers, M. D. (2010) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00328.x · Cited by 841
Gulliver, A., Griffiths, K. M., & Christensen, H. (2012) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-12-157 · Cited by 611
Mercer, K., Giangregorio, L., Schneider, E., Chilana, P., Li, M., & Grindrod, K. (2016) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.4225 · Cited by 419
Paul, D. L., & McDaniel, R. R. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148633 · Cited by 385
Jones, M., & Alony, I. (2011) · International Journal of Doctoral Studies · doi:10.28945/1429 · Cited by 246
“…(Charmaz, 2003; Goulding, 1998), it is imperative for emergence (Glaser & Strauss, 1967; Glaser, 1978), its absence from the con- 3 straints of a priori knowledge (Glaser & Strauss, 1967; Glaser, 1978), and the method’s ability to fit with different types of researchers (Martin & Turner, 1986).”
BackgroundMethodInvestigating software process in practice: A grounded theory perspective
Coleman, G., & O’Connor, R. (2008) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2007.07.027 · Cited by 202
(2015) · doi:10.5555/2818754.2818838 · Cited by 111
Wearing, Thinking, and Moving: Testing the Feasibility of Fitness Tracking with Urban Youth
Schaefer, S. E., Ching, C. C., Breen, H., & German, J. B. (2016) · American Journal of Health Education · doi:10.1080/19325037.2015.1111174 · Cited by 82
Gay and Greek: The Identity Paradox of Gay Fraternities
Yeung, K.-T., & Stombler, M. (2000) · Social Problems · doi:10.2307/3097155 · Cited by 42
(2002) · Cited by 30
Connecting BOP consumers and retailers: What drives small-time retailing through social media?
Kumar, J., Katiyar, G., Mehrotra, A., Attri, R., & Vishnoi, S. K. (2024) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103679 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, P. Y., & Turner, B. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1986-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-157
- ISSN
- 0021-8863 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6879
- OpenAlex
- W1993040486
- Cited by
- 1,213
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
