Cited by 202Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesAdvanced Software Engineering MethodologiesSoftware Engineering Research

Investigating software process in practice: A grounded theory perspective

Open access
Coleman, Gerry, O’Connor, Rory·2008·Journal of Systems and Software

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jss.2007.07.027

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current grounded theory guidelines in software engineering do not cover the reporting process.

    “However, this guidance does not extend to reporting GT studies.”

    From Grounded theory in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines (2016) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Methodology section (p. 4) says grounded theory has established guidelines for conducting inductive research. It does not say whether those guidelines cover reporting grounded theory studies; searches for reporting guidance found no passage addressing that point. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bach, J., 1994. The Immaturity of CMM, In: American Programmer, September, Vol. 7, No. 9, pp. 13-18.
  2. Boehm, B., Turner, R., 2004. Balancing Agility and Discipline, Addison Wesley.
  3. Fitzgibbon, C., 1996. ISO 9001 Registration: Lessons Learned by Canadian Software Companies, In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Management of Technology, Florida, 193-201.
  4. Lycett, M., Macredie, R.D., Patel, C., Paul, R.J., 2003. Migrating Agile Methods to Standardised Development Practices, In: IEEE Computer, June, 79-85.
  5. New Oxford Thesaurus of English, 2001, Oxford University Press.
  6. Rasmusson, J., 2003. Introducing XP into Greenfield Projects, In: IEEE Software, May/June, 21-28.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coleman, G., & O’Connor, R.
Affiliations
  • Dundalk Institute of Technology (IE)
  • Dublin City University (IE)
Corresponding author
O’Connor, Rory
Venue
Journal of Systems and Software
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
81
Issue
5
Pages
772-784
ISSN
0164-1212 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977543826
Cited by
202
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
FWCI
20.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Systems and Software (publishedVersion)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Dublin City University Open Access Institutional Repository (Dublin City University) (submittedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
Keywords
software development process, software process improvement, software process evolution, software management, software industry practices, implementation costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review