The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites using fused deposition modeling: Effects of process parameters on tensile properties
Abstract
Carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites have been intensively used for many applications due to their attractive properties. The increasing demand of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites is driving novel manufacturing processes to be in short manufacturing cycle time and low production cost, which is difficult to realize during carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites fabrication in common molding processes. Fused deposition modeling, as one of the additive manufacturing techniques, has been reported for fabricating carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites. The process parameters used in fused deposition modeling of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites follow those in fused deposition modeling of pure plastic materials. After adding fiber reinforcements, it is crucial to investigate proper fused deposition modeling process parameters to ensure the quality of the carbon fiber-reinforced plastic parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling. However, there are no reported investigations on the effects of fused deposition modeling process parameters on the mechanical properties of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites. In the experimental investigations of this paper, carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composite parts are fabricated using a fused deposition modeling machine. Tensile tests are conducted to obtain the tensile properties. The effects of fused deposition modeling process parameters on the tensile properties of fused deposition modeling-fabricated carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composite parts are investigated. The fracture interfaces of the parts after tensile testing are observed by a scanning electron microscope to explain material failure modes and reasons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T., & Tran, P. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12071529 · Cited by 1,052
Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects
Balla, V. K., Kate, K. H., Satyavolu, J., Singh, P., & Tadimeti, J. G. D. (2019) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 · Cited by 580
Recent Developments in Fused Deposition Modeling-Based 3D Printing of Polymers and Their Composites
Rahim, T. N. A. T., Abdullah, A. M., & Md Akil, H. (2019) · Polymer Reviews · doi:10.1080/15583724.2019.1597883 · Cited by 452
Subramaniyan, M., Karuppan, S., Eswaran, P., Appusamy, A., & Naveen Shankar, A. (2021) · Materials Today Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.865 · Cited by 23
Tagscherer, N., Bär, A. M., Zaremba, S., & Drechsler, K. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing · doi:10.3390/jmmp6020036 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Ning, F., Cong, W., Hu, Y., & Wang, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Composite Materials
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-28
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 451-462
- ISSN
- 0021-9983 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-793X
- OpenAlex
- W2342849624
- Cited by
- 632
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites using fused deposition modeling: Effects of process parameters on tensile properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0021998316646169
- The paper
- Ning, F., Cong, W., Hu, Y., & Wang, H. (2017). Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites using fused deposition modeling: Effects of process parameters on tensile properties. Journal of Composite Materials. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998316646169
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.