The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Light-Curing Units: A Review of What We Need to Know
Abstract
For improved interstudy reproducibility, reduced risk of premature failures, and ultimately better patient care, researchers and dentists need to know how to accurately characterize the electromagnetic radiation (light) they are delivering to the resins they are using. The output from a light-curing unit (LCU) is commonly characterized by its irradiance. If this value is measured at the light tip, it describes the radiant exitance from the surface of the light tip, and not the irradiance received by the specimen. The value quoted also reflects only an averaged value over the total measurement area and does not represent the irradiance that the resin specimen is receiving locally or at a different moment in time. Recent evidence has reported that the spectral emission and radiant exitance beam profiles from LCUs can be highly inhomogeneous. This can cause nonuniform temperature changes and uneven photopolymerization within the resin restoration. The spectral radiant power can be very different between different brands of LCUs, and the use of irradiance values derived from dental radiometers to describe the output from an LCU for research purposes is discouraged. Manufacturers should provide more information about the light output from the LCU and the absorption spectrum of their resin-based composite (RBC). Ideally, future assessments and research publications should include the following information about the curing light: 1) radiant power output throughout the exposure cycle and the spectral radiant power as a function of wavelength, 2) analysis of the light beam profile and spectral emission across the light beam, and 3) measurement and reporting of the light the RBC specimen received as well as the output measured at the light tip.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Light curing in dentistry and clinical implications: a literature review
RUEGGEBERG, F. A., GIANNINI, M., ARRAIS, C. A. G., & PRICE, R. B. T. (2017) · Brazilian Oral Research · doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0061 · Cited by 283
Self-citationThe dental curing light: A potential health risk
Price, R. B. T., Labrie, D., Bruzell, E. M., Sliney, D. H., & Strassler, H. E. (2016) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · doi:10.1080/15459624.2016.1165822 · Cited by 30
Self-citationGussgard, A. M., Weese, J. S., Hensten, A., & Jokstad, A. (2019) · Clinical and Experimental Dental Research · doi:10.1002/cre2.239 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, R. B., Ferracane, J. L., & Shortall, A. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-07-08
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1179-1186
- ISSN
- 0022-0345 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-0591
- OpenAlex
- W1768151018
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Light-Curing Units: A Review of What We Need to Know. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022034515594786
- The paper
- Price, R. B., Ferracane, J. L., & Shortall, A. C. (2015). Light-Curing Units: A Review of What We Need to Know. Journal of Dental Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515594786
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.