The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial Peptides: Mechanisms of Action and Resistance
Open accessAbstract
More than 40 antimicrobial peptides and proteins (AMPs) are expressed in the oral cavity. These AMPs have been organized into 6 functional groups, 1 of which, cationic AMPs, has received extensive attention in recent years for their promise as potential antibiotics. The goal of this review is to describe recent advances in our understanding of the diverse mechanisms of action of cationic AMPs and the bacterial resistance against these peptides. The recently developed peptide GL13K is used as an example to illustrate many of the discussed concepts. Cationic AMPs typically exhibit an amphipathic conformation, which allows increased interaction with negatively charged bacterial membranes. Peptides undergo changes in conformation and aggregation state in the presence of membranes; conversely, lipid conformation and packing can adapt to the presence of peptides. As a consequence, a single peptide can act through several mechanisms depending on the peptide’s structure, the peptide:lipid ratio, and the properties of the lipid membrane. Accumulating evidence shows that in addition to acting at the cell membrane, AMPs may act on the cell wall, inhibit protein folding or enzyme activity, or act intracellularly. Therefore, once a peptide has reached the cell wall, cell membrane, or its internal target, the difference in mechanism of action on gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria may be less pronounced than formerly assumed. While AMPs should not cause widespread resistance due to their preferential attack on the cell membrane, in cases where specific protein targets are involved, the possibility exists for genetic mutations and bacterial resistance. Indeed, the potential clinical use of AMPs has raised the concern that resistance to therapeutic AMPs could be associated with resistance to endogenous host-defense peptides. Current evidence suggests that this is a rare event that can be overcome by subtle structural modifications of an AMP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agents that increase the permeability of the outer membrane
Vaara, M. (1992) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.56.3.395-411.1992 · Cited by 1,879
Cited by
Bacterial Biofilm Eradication Agents: A Current Review
Verderosa, A. D., Totsika, M., & Fairfull-Smith, K. E. (2019) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2019.00824 · Cited by 555
Reassessing the Host Defense Peptide Landscape
Haney, E. F., Straus, S. K., & Hancock, R. E. W. (2019) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2019.00043 · Cited by 359
Antimicrobial peptides towards clinical application: Delivery and formulation
Wang, C., Hong, T., Cui, P., Wang, J., & Xia, J. (2021) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.028 · Cited by 281
Antimicrobial peptides: Structure, mechanism, and modification
Chen, N., & Jiang, C. (2023) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115377 · Cited by 279
Lima, P. G., Oliveira, J. T. A., Amaral, J. L., Freitas, C. D. T., & Souza, P. F. N. (2021) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119647 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Bechinger, B., & Gorr, S.-U.
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-11-25
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 254-260
- ISSN
- 0022-0345 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-0591
- OpenAlex
- W2556828189
- Cited by
- 739
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial Peptides: Mechanisms of Action and Resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022034516679973
- The paper
- Bechinger, B., & Gorr, S.-U. (2017). Antimicrobial Peptides: Mechanisms of Action and Resistance. Journal of Dental Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516679973
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.