Cited by 58Reproductive Health and ContraceptionPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareDiversity and Career in Medicine

“We’re a Little Biased”: Medicine and the Management of Bias through the Case of Contraception

Manzer, Jamie L., Bell, Ann V.·2021·Journal of Health and Social Behavior

Abstract

There is a wealth of literature demonstrating the presence of bias throughout the American health care system. Despite acknowledging such presence, however, little is known about how bias functions within medical encounters, particularly how providers grapple with bias in their patient counseling and decision-making. We explore such processes through the case of contraceptive counseling, a highly raced, classed, and gendered context. In-depth interviews with 51 health care providers reveal that providers use four primary strategies to navigate and minimize bias in their care—using scientific rationale, employing “safe” biases, standardizing counseling, and implementing patient-centered care. Paradoxically, using these strategies can exacerbate rather than resolve bias. Understanding these bias management strategies reveals provider-held biases, how they manifest within appointments, and the potential consequences for patients’ health autonomy. Such knowledge informs interventions that promote contraceptive use among women in the United States, addresses bias in health care broadly, and thus ultimately helps combat health disparities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00221465211003232

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manzer, J. L., & Bell, A. V.
Affiliations
University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Manzer, Jamie L.
Venue
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Published
2021-04-12
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
120-135
ISSN
  • 0022-1465 (ISSN-L)
  • 2150-6000
OpenAlex
W4205217429
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health and Social Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Anonymous Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
medical bias, contraceptive counseling, healthcare workers, racial bias, socioeconomic status, gender, patient-centered care, health disparities, health autonomy, contraceptive use, clinical decision-making
MeSH terms
Contraception, Counseling, Family Planning Services, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, United States, Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review