The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Application of Photoshop-based Image Analysis to Quantification of Hormone Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
The benefit of quantifying estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression in breast cancer is well established. However, in routine breast cancer diagnosis, receptor expression is often quantified in arbitrary scores with high inter- and intraobserver variability. In this study we tested the validity of an image analysis system employing inexpensive, commercially available computer software on a personal computer. In a series of 28 invasive ductal breast cancers, immunohistochemical determinations of ER and PR were performed, along with biochemical analyses on fresh tumor homogenates, by the dextran-coated charcoal technique (DCC) and by enzyme immunoassay (EIA). From each immunohistochemical slide, three representative tumor fields (x20 objective) were captured and digitized with a Macintosh personal computer. Using the tools of Photoshop software, optical density plots of tumor cell nuclei were generated and, after background subtraction, were used as an index of immunostaining intensity. This immunostaining index showed a strong semilogarithmic correlation with biochemical receptor assessments of ER (DCC, r = 0.70, p >0.001; EIA, r = 0.76, p >0.001) and even better of PR (DCC, r = 0.86; p >0.01; EIA, r = 0.80, p >0.001). A strong linear correlation of ER and PR quantification was also seen between DCC and EIA techniques (ER, r = 0.62, p >0.001; PR, r = 0.92, p >0.001). This study demonstrates that a simple, inexpensive, commercially available software program can be accurately applied to the quantification of immunohistochemical hormone receptor studies. (J Histochem Cytochem 45:1559–1565, 1997)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Macrophage Depletion Inhibits Experimental Choroidal Neovascularization
Sakurai, E., Anand, A., Ambati, B. K., van Rooijen, N., & Ambati, J. (2003) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.03-0097 · Cited by 503
Immunohistochemistry as an Important Tool in Biomarkers Detection and Clinical Practice
De Matos, L. L., Trufelli, D. C., De Matos, M. G. L., & Da Silva Pinhal, M. A. (2010) · Biomarker Insights · doi:10.4137/bmi.s2185 · Cited by 437
Wahrenbrock, M., Borsig, L., Le, D., Varki, N., & Varki, A. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci200318882 · Cited by 317
Ta, N. N., Schuyler, C. A., Li, Y., Lopes-Virella, M. F., & Huang, Y. (2011) · Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology · doi:10.1097/fjc.0b013e31821e5626 · Cited by 156
Honorato‐Sampaio, K., Pereira, V. M., Santos, R. A. S., & Reis, A. M. (2012) · Experimental Physiology · doi:10.1113/expphysiol.2011.061960 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Lehr, H.-A., Mankoff, D. A., Corwin, D., Santeusanio, G., & Gown, A. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1559-1565
- ISSN
- 0022-1554 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-5044
- OpenAlex
- W2164792647
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Application of Photoshop-based Image Analysis to Quantification of Hormone Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002215549704501112
- The paper
- Lehr, H.-A., Mankoff, D. A., Corwin, D., Santeusanio, G., & Gown, A. M. (1997). Application of Photoshop-based Image Analysis to Quantification of Hormone Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1177/002215549704501112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.