Cited by 199Reading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and DisordersEarly Childhood Education and Development

A Synthesis of Read-Aloud Interventions on Early Reading Outcomes Among Preschool Through Third Graders at Risk for Reading Difficulties

Open access
Swanson, Elizabeth, Vaughn, Sharon, Wanzek, Jeanne, Petscher, Yaacov, Heckert, Jennifer, Cavanaugh, Christie, Kraft, Guliz, Tackett, Kathryn·2011·Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

A synthesis and meta-analysis of the extant research on the effects of storybook read-aloud interventions for children at risk for reading difficulties ages 3 to 8 is provided. A total of 29 studies met criteria for the synthesis, with 18 studies providing sufficient data for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Read-aloud instruction has been examined using dialogic reading; repeated reading of stories; story reading with limited questioning before, during, and/or after reading; computer-assisted story reading; and story reading with extended vocabulary activities. Significant, positive effects on children’s language, phonological awareness, print concepts, comprehension, and vocabulary outcomes were found. Despite the positive effects for read-aloud interventions, only a small amount of outcome variance was accounted for by intervention type.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022219410378444

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis of read-aloud interventions found moderate to large effects on multiple aspects of literacy development, including phonological awareness and vocabulary.

    “A meta-analysis of read-aloud interventions, of which dialogic reading is an example, found moderate to large effects on multiple aspects of literacy development including phonological awareness and vocabulary (Swanson et al. 2011).”

    From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as Swanson et al. 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lonigan CJ Anthony JL Bloomfield B Dyer SM Samwel C 1999 Effects of two preschool shared reading interventions on the emergent literacy skills of children from low-income families Journal of Early Intervention 22 306 322

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swanson, E., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., Heckert, J., Cavanaugh, C., Kraft, G., & Tackett, K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Kennesaw State University (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • American Institutes for Research (US)
Corresponding author
Swanson, Elizabeth
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
2011-04-26
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
258-275
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
OpenAlex
W2103523745
Cited by
199
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R03HD060758, P50HD052120)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
storybook reading, early reading difficulties, at-risk readers, dialogic reading, repeated reading, vocabulary development, phonological awareness, print concepts, reading comprehension, language development
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Awareness, Child, Child Language, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Language Development Disorders, Male, Reading, Vocabulary, Treatment Outcome, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review