CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 92Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The WISC-R and Learning Disabilities Assessment: State of the Art

Kaufman, Alan S.·1981·Journal of Learning Disabilities
DOI 10.1177/002221948101400907
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper reviews WISC-R research that has particular pertinence for the assessment of learning disabilities. Three topics are treated in depth: factor analysis investigations, recategorization of subtests into Bannatyne's four groupings, and interscale/intrascale scatter. For each topic, relevant current research findings are summarized and interpreted, their implications for LD assessment are explored, and avenues for future research are delineated.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002221948101400907

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

4 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Bannatyne, A., 1971, Language, Reading, and Learning Disabilities
  2. Baumeister, A. A., 1962, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 66, 641
  3. Dean, R. S., Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association
  4. 10.1037/0022-006X.46.5.1160 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0022-0663.73.2.227 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0022-0663.72.2.197 · DOI
  7. Kaufman, A. S., 1981, A Handbook for School Psychology
  8. Naglieri, J. A., 1979, A Comparison of McCarthy GCI and WISC-R IQ Scores for Educable Mentally Retarded, Learning Disabled and Normal Children
  9. 10.1037/0022-006X.47.3.643 · DOI
  10. Reynolds, C. R., 1981, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14
  11. Ryckman, D. B., 1981, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14
  12. Stevenson, L. P., Paper presented at the meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children
  13. 10.1002/1520-6807(197904)16:2<183::AID-PITS2310160205>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI
  14. 10.1002/1520-6807(197804)15:2<166::AID-PITS2310150205>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI
  15. 10.1037/0022-006X.48.4.440 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/1520-6807(198101)18:1<43::AID-PITS2310180110>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/0022-006X.43.5.661 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 92

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kaufman, A. S.
Corresponding author
Kaufman, Alan S.
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1981-11
Volume
14
Issue
9
Pages
520-526
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
DOI
10.1177/002221948101400907
OpenAlex
W1968898080
Cited by
91
References
53
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
9.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
WISC-R, factor analysis
MeSH terms
Attention, Child, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Intelligence, Learning Disabilities, Research, Verbal Behavior, Visual Perception, Wechsler Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review