The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority
Abstract
Strategy is about seeking new edges in a market while slowing the erosion of present advantages. Effective strategy moves are grounded in valid and insightful monitoring of the current competitive position coupled with evidence that reveals the skills and resources affording the most leverage on future cost and differentiation advantages. Too often the available measures and methods do not satisfy these requirements. Only a limited set of measures may be used, depending on whether the business starts with the market and uses a customer-focused approach or alternatively adopts a competitor-centered perspective. To overcome possible myopia, the evidence of advantage should illuminate the sources of advantage as well as the manifestations of superior customer value and cost superiority, and should be based on a balance of customer and competitor perspectives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction
Churchill, G. A., & Surprenant, C. (1982) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151722 · Cited by 2,914
Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation as Alternative Marketing Strategies
Smith, W. R. (1956) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1247695 · Cited by 1,910
Cited by
Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299305700304 · Cited by 4,343
Schilke, O., Hu, S., & Helfat, C. E. (2018) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0014 · Cited by 1,226
Market orientation and innovation
Atuahene-Gima, K. (1996) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/0148-2963(95)00051-8 · Cited by 900
Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S., & Calantone, R. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.450 · Cited by 844
A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States
Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1997) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299706100201 · Cited by 709
Metadata
- Authors
- Day, G. S., & Wensley, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1988-04
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-20
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2071505436
- Cited by
- 2,651
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 52.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224298805200201
- The paper
- Day, G. S., & Wensley, R. (1988). Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.