The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions
Abstract
Two studies were conducted to obtain insights on how consumers form attitudes toward brand extensions, (i.e., use of an established brand name to enter a new product category). In one study, reactions to 20 brand extension concepts involving six well-known brand names were examined. Attitude toward the extension was higher when (1) there was both a perception of “fit” between the two product classes along one of three dimensions and a perception of high quality for the original brand or (2) the extension was not regarded as too easy to make. A second study examined the effectiveness of different positioning strategies for extensions. The experimental findings show that potentially negative associations can be neutralized more effectively by elaborating on the attributes of the brand extension than by reminding consumers of the positive associations with the original brand.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change.
Osgood, C. E., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1955) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048153 · Cited by 1,700
Retrieval selectivity in memory-based impression judgments.
Lingle, J. H., & Ostrom, T. M. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.2.180 · Cited by 256
Cited by
Return on Marketing: Using Customer Equity to Focus Marketing Strategy
Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.109.24030 · Cited by 2,151
Bolton, R. N., Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2004) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070304263341 · Cited by 741
A Survey-Based Method for Measuring and Understanding Brand Equity and Its Extendibility
Park, C. S., & Srinivasan, V. (1994) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379403100210 · Cited by 446
Cheah, I., & Phau, I. (2011) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/02634501111153674 · Cited by 425
Alcañiz, E. B., Cáceres, R. C., & Pérez, R. C. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0461-x · Cited by 291
The impact of satisfaction and payment equity on cross-buying
Verhoef, P. C., Franses, P. H., & Hoekstra, J. C. (2001) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(01)00052-5 · Cited by 276
Yang, S., Lu, Y., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2013) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.09.011 · Cited by 112
Customer Referral Reward–Brand–Fit: A Schema Congruity Perspective
Stumpf, C., & Baum, M. (2016) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20896 · Cited by 40
Salazar, M. T., Harrison, T., & Ansell, J. (2007) · Journal of Financial Services Marketing · doi:10.1057/palgrave.fsm.4760066 · Cited by 35
Unlocking Online Reputation: On the Effectiveness of Cross-Platform Signaling in the Sharing Economy
Teubner, T., Adam, M. T. P., & Hawlitschek, F. (2020) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-019-00620-4 · Cited by 35
Açikgöz, F. Y., Kayakuş, M., Zăbavă, B.-Ș., & Kabas, O. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16229681 · Cited by 25
Building customer-based brand equity of domestic brands: Role of brand equity dimensions
Sharma, R. (2017) · Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research · doi:10.1177/0972622517702187 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-41
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W1991218014
- Cited by
- 3,252
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 64.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
