Cited by 256Memory Processes and InfluencesSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and Psychology

Retrieval selectivity in memory-based impression judgments.

Lingle, John H., Ostrom, Thomas M.·1979·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.37.2.180

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lingle, J. H., & Ostrom, T. M.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1979-02
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
180-194
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2023193103
Cited by
256
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
impression formation, memory retrieval, person perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review